Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English

This study contributes to a growing body of research on the social meanings of linguistic variation with particular interest in the cognitive processes governing their emergence. Our research follows in the tradition of Labov et al.'s (2011) work on the sociolinguistic monitor, a cognitive mechanism hypothesized to track quantitative linguistic variation and prompt social evaluations (Labov et al. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. <i>Journal of Sociolinguistics</i> 15(4). 431-463). Previous research shows that L1 English listeners are sensitive to frequency variation, but it is unclear whether this also applies to L2 listeners. This study thus replicates Labov et al.'s (2011) original experiment in a context where English is primarily acquired through L2 instruction. To test the generality of <i>sociolinguistic monitoring</i>, we investigate L2 listeners' sensitivity to quantitative differences in sociolinguistic variation (ing) as well as proficiency-based variation. Since participants were L1 speakers of (Austrian) German, we tested evaluations of varying realizations of /θ/ ([θ]/[s]), /d/ ([d]/[t]), and /w/ ([w]/[v]). Experiments included 135 participants, who rated several versions of newscaster test passages regarding <i>professionalism</i>. Our data shows that both sociolinguistic and proficiency-based variation are monitored and evaluated by L2 listeners, albeit to different extents. This supports the assumption that the focus of the monitoring process is <i>socially meaningful variation</i> that includes L1 sociolinguistic but also L2 proficiency-based features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2023-0073
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English

Erik Schleef, Jana Pflaeging, Bradley Mackay
2 citations
Linguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
3.77
article

Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English

Erik Schleef, Jana Pflaeging, Bradley Mackay
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study contributes to a growing body of research on the social meanings of linguistic variation with particular interest in the cognitive processes governing their emergence. Our research follows in the tradition of Labov et al.'s (2011) work on the sociolinguistic monitor, a cognitive mechanism hypothesized to track quantitative linguistic variation and prompt social evaluations (Labov et al. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. <i>Journal of Sociolinguistics</i> 15(4). 431-463). Previous research shows that L1 English listeners are sensitive to frequency variation, but it is unclear whether this also applies to L2 listeners. This study thus replicates Labov et al.'s (2011) original experiment in a context where English is primarily acquired through L2 instruction. To test the generality of <i>sociolinguistic monitoring</i>, we investigate L2 listeners' sensitivity to quantitative differences in sociolinguistic variation (ing) as well as proficiency-based variation. Since participants were L1 speakers of (Austrian) German, we tested evaluations of varying realizations of /θ/ ([θ]/[s]), /d/ ([d]/[t]), and /w/ ([w]/[v]). Experiments included 135 participants, who rated several versions of newscaster test passages regarding <i>professionalism</i>. Our data shows that both sociolinguistic and proficiency-based variation are monitored and evaluated by L2 listeners, albeit to different extents. This supports the assumption that the focus of the monitoring process is <i>socially meaningful variation</i> that includes L1 sociolinguistic but also L2 proficiency-based features.

LinguisticsVol. 63(3)
University of Freiburg (DE), University of Salzburg (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.