Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty

Abstract This paper explores bidding behaviour under risk and uncertainty using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism (BDM) and second price auction (SPA). It investigates whether values elicited via the two mechanisms are consistent and whether bidding behaviour can be influenced by differences in the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that people face when exposed to the two mechanisms. In our experiment, subjects are exposed to non-monetary lotteries where they bid for a high-quality seafood product, but there is a chance (known or unknown) that they receive a lower quality seafood product instead. Results indicate that bidding behaviour can be influenced by the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that subjects face and subjects’ bidding behaviour is only consistent with standard theories of decision making under risk and uncertainty when they bid on a risky product in the SPA. Despite this, BDM and SPA elicit equal values under risk and uncertainty in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Decision
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-024-10005-z
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty

Daniel Derbyshire, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Simone Cerroni, George Hutchinson et al.
Theory and Decision
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty

Daniel Derbyshire, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Simone Cerroni, George Hutchinson, Chloe McCallum
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores bidding behaviour under risk and uncertainty using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism (BDM) and second price auction (SPA). It investigates whether values elicited via the two mechanisms are consistent and whether bidding behaviour can be influenced by differences in the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that people face when exposed to the two mechanisms. In our experiment, subjects are exposed to non-monetary lotteries where they bid for a high-quality seafood product, but there is a chance (known or unknown) that they receive a lower quality seafood product instead. Results indicate that bidding behaviour can be influenced by the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that subjects face and subjects’ bidding behaviour is only consistent with standard theories of decision making under risk and uncertainty when they bid on a risky product in the SPA. Despite this, BDM and SPA elicit equal values under risk and uncertainty in this study.

Theory and DecisionVol. 98(3)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Trento (IT), Korea University (KR), University of Exeter (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Invest Northern Ireland, Department for the Economy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty — Daniel Derbyshire, Rodolfo M. Nayga, et al. · Theory and Decision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS