Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty
Abstract This paper explores bidding behaviour under risk and uncertainty using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism (BDM) and second price auction (SPA). It investigates whether values elicited via the two mechanisms are consistent and whether bidding behaviour can be influenced by differences in the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that people face when exposed to the two mechanisms. In our experiment, subjects are exposed to non-monetary lotteries where they bid for a high-quality seafood product, but there is a chance (known or unknown) that they receive a lower quality seafood product instead. Results indicate that bidding behaviour can be influenced by the number and type of sources of risk and uncertainty that subjects face and subjects’ bidding behaviour is only consistent with standard theories of decision making under risk and uncertainty when they bid on a risky product in the SPA. Despite this, BDM and SPA elicit equal values under risk and uncertainty in this study.
Authors
- Daniel Derbyshire (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-6105)
- Rodolfo M. Nayga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-4332)
- Simone Cerroni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-1591)
- George Hutchinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-7868)
- Chloe McCallum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7947-0261)
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Korea University (KR)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Theory and Decision
- Published
- 2024-09-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-024-10005-z
- Primary Topic
- Auction Theory and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Invest Northern Ireland
- Department for the Economy