A comparative analysis of single learning and ensemble learning approaches for the forecasting of electricity prices

Forecasting electricity prices accurately is imperative in deregulated power markets. Nonetheless, the intricate nature of electricity prices, characterized by high frequency and volatility, poses a challenge in building an effective forecasting model for policymakers and scientists. Precision in the electricity price prediction is crucial for providing valuable guidance to market participants, helping them maximize their benefits. In prior studies, various methods, including statistical models and artificial neural network models, have been used to forecast electricity prices. This study proposes three ensemble learning approaches - AdaBoost-LSTM, AdaBoost-BLSTM, and AdaBoost-GRU - which combine the AdaBoost algorithm with LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and GRU networks, respectively, to enhance the accuracy of electricity price predictions. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of the proposed models by comparing their predictive performance with that of single RNN-based models (LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU) using daily maximum electricity prices from 2004 to 2008. Notably, there has been no existing research that compares the effectiveness of these single and hybrid models. In the current literature, these single models are widely acknowledged as potent tools for improving forecasting accuracy. On the other hand, although the proposed ensemble learning approaches obtained using the AdaBoost boosting technique have been used in areas such as financial forecasting so far, they have never been used in electricity price forecasting. Accuracy assessment utilizing R-squared and MAPE clearly demonstrates that the AdaBoost-BLSTM approach performs very closely to, but better than, other boosting ensemble approaches, and significantly better than single models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1689
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of single learning and ensemble learning approaches for the forecasting of electricity prices

Fatma Yaprakdal
2 citations
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.42
article

A comparative analysis of single learning and ensemble learning approaches for the forecasting of electricity prices

Fatma Yaprakdal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Forecasting electricity prices accurately is imperative in deregulated power markets. Nonetheless, the intricate nature of electricity prices, characterized by high frequency and volatility, poses a challenge in building an effective forecasting model for policymakers and scientists. Precision in the electricity price prediction is crucial for providing valuable guidance to market participants, helping them maximize their benefits. In prior studies, various methods, including statistical models and artificial neural network models, have been used to forecast electricity prices. This study proposes three ensemble learning approaches - AdaBoost-LSTM, AdaBoost-BLSTM, and AdaBoost-GRU - which combine the AdaBoost algorithm with LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and GRU networks, respectively, to enhance the accuracy of electricity price predictions. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of the proposed models by comparing their predictive performance with that of single RNN-based models (LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU) using daily maximum electricity prices from 2004 to 2008. Notably, there has been no existing research that compares the effectiveness of these single and hybrid models. In the current literature, these single models are widely acknowledged as potent tools for improving forecasting accuracy. On the other hand, although the proposed ensemble learning approaches obtained using the AdaBoost boosting technique have been used in areas such as financial forecasting so far, they have never been used in electricity price forecasting. Accuracy assessment utilizing R-squared and MAPE clearly demonstrates that the AdaBoost-BLSTM approach performs very closely to, but better than, other boosting ensemble approaches, and significantly better than single models.

Edelweiss Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 8(5)
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.