The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% (<i>P</i> < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, <i>P</i> < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, <i>P</i> < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, <i>P</i> < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, <i>P</i> < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angiology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241273433
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Claire Lawson, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Harriette G.C. Van Spall et al.
Angiology
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Claire Lawson, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Harriette G.C. Van Spall, Saadiq Moledina, Nicholas Weight, Muhammed Rashid, Mamas Mamas
article en

Abstract

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% (<i>P</i> < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, <i>P</i> < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, <i>P</i> < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, <i>P</i> < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, <i>P</i> < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, <i>P</i> < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes.

AngiologyVol. 77(1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Leicester (GB), University of Toronto (CA), Glenfield Hospital (GB), Health Sciences Centre (CA), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Population Health Research Institute (CA), University of Manchester (GB), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), St. Joseph Hospital (US), Impact (CA), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Keele University (GB), McMaster University (CA)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.