Seasonal snow–atmosphere modeling: let's do it

Abstract. Mountain snowpack forecasting relies on accurate mass and energy input information in relation to the snowpack. For this reason, coupled snow–atmosphere models, which downscale input fields to the snow model using atmospheric physics, have been developed. These coupled models are often limited in the spatial and temporal extents of their use by computational constraints. In addressing this challenge, we introduce HICARsnow, an intermediate-complexity coupled snow–atmosphere model. HICARsnow couples two physics-based models of intermediate complexity to enable basin-scale snow and atmospheric modeling at seasonal timescales. To showcase the efficacy and capability of HICARsnow, we present results from its application to a high-elevation basin in the Swiss Alps. The simulated snow depth is compared throughout the snow season to aerial lidar data. The model shows reasonable agreement with observations from peak accumulation through late-season melt-out, representing areas of high snow accumulation due to redistribution processes, as well as melt patterns caused by interactions between radiation and topography. HICARsnow is also found to resolve preferential deposition, with model outputs suggesting that parameterizations of the process using surface wind fields may only be inappropriate under certain atmospheric conditions. The two-way coupled model also improves surface air temperatures over late-season snow, demonstrating added value for the atmospheric model as well. Differences between observations and model outputs during the accumulation season indicate a poor representation of redistribution processes away from exposed ridges and steep terrain and a low bias in albedo at high elevations during the ablation season. Overall, HICARsnow shows great promise for applications in operational snow forecasting and in studying the representation of snow accumulation and ablation processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal snow–atmosphere modeling: let's do it

Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Rebecca Mott et al.
3 citations
˜The œcryosphere
Cryospheric studies and observations
1.13
article

Seasonal snow–atmosphere modeling: let's do it

Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Rebecca Mott, Justine Berg, Dylan Reynolds, Tobias Jonas, Michael Haugeneder
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Mountain snowpack forecasting relies on accurate mass and energy input information in relation to the snowpack. For this reason, coupled snow–atmosphere models, which downscale input fields to the snow model using atmospheric physics, have been developed. These coupled models are often limited in the spatial and temporal extents of their use by computational constraints. In addressing this challenge, we introduce HICARsnow, an intermediate-complexity coupled snow–atmosphere model. HICARsnow couples two physics-based models of intermediate complexity to enable basin-scale snow and atmospheric modeling at seasonal timescales. To showcase the efficacy and capability of HICARsnow, we present results from its application to a high-elevation basin in the Swiss Alps. The simulated snow depth is compared throughout the snow season to aerial lidar data. The model shows reasonable agreement with observations from peak accumulation through late-season melt-out, representing areas of high snow accumulation due to redistribution processes, as well as melt patterns caused by interactions between radiation and topography. HICARsnow is also found to resolve preferential deposition, with model outputs suggesting that parameterizations of the process using surface wind fields may only be inappropriate under certain atmospheric conditions. The two-way coupled model also improves surface air temperatures over late-season snow, demonstrating added value for the atmospheric model as well. Differences between observations and model outputs during the accumulation season indicate a poor representation of redistribution processes away from exposed ridges and steep terrain and a low bias in albedo at high elevations during the ablation season. Overall, HICARsnow shows great promise for applications in operational snow forecasting and in studying the representation of snow accumulation and ablation processes.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 18(9)
University of Bern (CH), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cryospheric studies and observations
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.