Practical Incorporation of Stakeholder-Informed Ethics into Research Funding Decisions

Research funding has been criticized as biased against novel initiatives and lacking diversity, which leads to further disparities. Patient and stakeholder engagement could support research that goes beyond traditional paradigms and increases diversity. However, best practices to engage stakeholders in research, including funding decisions, continue to be developed. We report on the implementation of stakeholder input in two federally funded initiatives, one that seeks to advance research reducing disparities, and the other seeks to advance deprescribing research. Overall, the review process includes stakeholders as decision makers and supports their efforts through group discussion and other activities. Reconciling stakeholder input that may differ from scientific peer review is a challenge within the decision for funding. Lessons learned include balancing stakeholder and scientific assessments and including guidance on stakeholder engagement to grant awardees.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in community health partnerships
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2024.a937398
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Incorporation of Stakeholder-Informed Ethics into Research Funding Decisions

Katie Maslow, Catherine A. Sarkisian, Merton Lee, Nicole Brandt et al.
1 citations
Progress in community health partnerships
Health and Medical Research Impacts
0.54
article

Practical Incorporation of Stakeholder-Informed Ethics into Research Funding Decisions

Katie Maslow, Catherine A. Sarkisian, Merton Lee, Nicole Brandt, Daniel Mansour, Carmen Elena Salinas Reyes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research funding has been criticized as biased against novel initiatives and lacking diversity, which leads to further disparities. Patient and stakeholder engagement could support research that goes beyond traditional paradigms and increases diversity. However, best practices to engage stakeholders in research, including funding decisions, continue to be developed. We report on the implementation of stakeholder input in two federally funded initiatives, one that seeks to advance research reducing disparities, and the other seeks to advance deprescribing research. Overall, the review process includes stakeholders as decision makers and supports their efforts through group discussion and other activities. Reconciling stakeholder input that may differ from scientific peer review is a challenge within the decision for funding. Lessons learned include balancing stakeholder and scientific assessments and including guidance on stakeholder engagement to grant awardees.

Progress in community health partnershipsVol. 18(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practical Incorporation of Stakeholder-Informed Ethics into Research Funding Decisions — Katie Maslow, Catherine A. Sarkisian, et al. · Progress in community health partnerships (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS