Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?

Abstract In this study, we explore the relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Drawing on insights from the social psychology literature, we theorize that CEOs are cognizant that their perceived greed has implications for how observers respond to failures in workplace safety. Our theorizing points to a somewhat counterintuitive positive relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Consistent with our theorizing, we find that the relationship is attenuated when the CEO is insulated from how observers respond to firm conduct and is amplified when the CEO’s characteristics have a larger impact on how observers respond to adverse firm-level events. We contribute to business ethics research on executive greed, on the relationship between CEO traits and (ir)responsible corporate conduct, and on the antecedents of workplace safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05820-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?

Jennifer R. Overbeck, Madhu Veeraraghavan, Leon Zolotoy, Don O’Sullivan
5 citations
Journal of Business Ethics
Ethics in Business and Education
5.25
article

Are Employees Safer When the CEO Looks Greedy?

Jennifer R. Overbeck, Madhu Veeraraghavan, Leon Zolotoy, Don O’Sullivan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we explore the relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Drawing on insights from the social psychology literature, we theorize that CEOs are cognizant that their perceived greed has implications for how observers respond to failures in workplace safety. Our theorizing points to a somewhat counterintuitive positive relationship between perceived CEO greed and workplace safety. Consistent with our theorizing, we find that the relationship is attenuated when the CEO is insulated from how observers respond to firm conduct and is amplified when the CEO’s characteristics have a larger impact on how observers respond to adverse firm-level events. We contribute to business ethics research on executive greed, on the relationship between CEO traits and (ir)responsible corporate conduct, and on the antecedents of workplace safety.

Journal of Business EthicsVol. 198(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), T A Pai Management Institute (IN)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in Business and Education
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.