‘Saying No’: Frames of Sexual Abuse in Survivors’ Narratives

Abstract Using qualitative interviews with survivors and activists against sexual violence in the Catholic Church in Switzerland, this article suggests that the expression “saying no” or the idea of “refusal” frames discussions regarding child sexual abuse with detrimental consequences. This discourse is sometimes linked to a restrictive understanding of sexual consent and is applied to children in very asymmetrical relationships, who should be placed outside the scope of sexual consent. Particularly for men who have been sexually abused as children, this understanding of consent is referred to when speaking about sexual abuse. This asks questions about the gender norms influencing the discourse of consent and the challenges of understanding oneself as a victim of abuse. The article argues for a critical examination of the concept of consent and its connection to children and minors. It suggests that it is crucial, as many (feminist) scholars in different fields have argued, to abandon a negative standard of consent (saying no, resisting) in politics against sexual violence and instead focus on the capability to participate in and determine the sexual relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-024-00215-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Saying No’: Frames of Sexual Abuse in Survivors’ Narratives

Romaine Girod
1 citations
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Gender, Feminism, and Media
0.93
article

‘Saying No’: Frames of Sexual Abuse in Survivors’ Narratives

Romaine Girod
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using qualitative interviews with survivors and activists against sexual violence in the Catholic Church in Switzerland, this article suggests that the expression “saying no” or the idea of “refusal” frames discussions regarding child sexual abuse with detrimental consequences. This discourse is sometimes linked to a restrictive understanding of sexual consent and is applied to children in very asymmetrical relationships, who should be placed outside the scope of sexual consent. Particularly for men who have been sexually abused as children, this understanding of consent is referred to when speaking about sexual abuse. This asks questions about the gender norms influencing the discourse of consent and the challenges of understanding oneself as a victim of abuse. The article argues for a critical examination of the concept of consent and its connection to children and minors. It suggests that it is crucial, as many (feminist) scholars in different fields have argued, to abandon a negative standard of consent (saying no, resisting) in politics against sexual violence and instead focus on the capability to participate in and determine the sexual relationship.

International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and PracticeVol. 9(1)
Institute of Social Sciences (RS), University of Lausanne (CH)
Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.