A perspective on the need for integrated frameworks linking species distribution and dynamic forest landscape models across spatial scales

Climate change significantly alters species distributions. Numerous studies project the future distribution of species using Species Distribution models (SDMs), most often using coarse resolutions. Working at coarse resolutions in forest ecosystems fails to capture landscape-level dynamics, spatially explicit processes, and temporally defined events that act at finer resolutions and that can disproportionately affect future outcomes. Dynamic Forest Landscape Models (FLMs) can simulate the survival, growth, and mortality of (stands of) trees over long time periods at small resolutions. However, as they are able to simulate at fine resolutions, study landscapes remain relatively small due to computational constraints. The large amount of feedbacks between biodiversity, forest, and ecosystem processes cannot completely be captured by FLMs or SDMs alone. Integrating SDMs with FLMs enables a more detailed understanding of the impact of perturbations on forest landscapes and their biodiversity. Several studies have used this approach at landscape scales, using fine resolutions. Yet, many scientific questions in the fields of biogeography, macroecology, conservation management, among others, require a focus on both large scales and fine resolutions. Here, drawn from literature and experience, we provide our perspective on the most important challenges that need to be overcome to use integrated frameworks at spatial scales larger than the landscape and at fine resolutions. Future research should prioritize these challenges to better understand drivers of species distributions in forest ecosystems and effectively design conservation strategies under the influence of changing climates on spatially and temporally explicit processes. We further discuss possibilities to address these challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1112712
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A perspective on the need for integrated frameworks linking species distribution and dynamic forest landscape models across spatial scales

Matti Koivula, Paola Mairota, Anouschka R. Hof, Georg Leitinger et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
article

A perspective on the need for integrated frameworks linking species distribution and dynamic forest landscape models across spatial scales

Matti Koivula, Paola Mairota, Anouschka R. Hof, Georg Leitinger, J Bruna, Matija Klopčić, Francisco X. Aguilar, Marco Mina, Giorgio Vacchiano, Jörgen Sjögren
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Climate change significantly alters species distributions. Numerous studies project the future distribution of species using Species Distribution models (SDMs), most often using coarse resolutions. Working at coarse resolutions in forest ecosystems fails to capture landscape-level dynamics, spatially explicit processes, and temporally defined events that act at finer resolutions and that can disproportionately affect future outcomes. Dynamic Forest Landscape Models (FLMs) can simulate the survival, growth, and mortality of (stands of) trees over long time periods at small resolutions. However, as they are able to simulate at fine resolutions, study landscapes remain relatively small due to computational constraints. The large amount of feedbacks between biodiversity, forest, and ecosystem processes cannot completely be captured by FLMs or SDMs alone. Integrating SDMs with FLMs enables a more detailed understanding of the impact of perturbations on forest landscapes and their biodiversity. Several studies have used this approach at landscape scales, using fine resolutions. Yet, many scientific questions in the fields of biogeography, macroecology, conservation management, among others, require a focus on both large scales and fine resolutions. Here, drawn from literature and experience, we provide our perspective on the most important challenges that need to be overcome to use integrated frameworks at spatial scales larger than the landscape and at fine resolutions. Future research should prioritize these challenges to better understand drivers of species distributions in forest ecosystems and effectively design conservation strategies under the influence of changing climates on spatially and temporally explicit processes. We further discuss possibilities to address these challenges.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 12
Eurac Research (IT), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Milan (IT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Inland Norway (NO), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Akademie Věd České Republiky, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.