A meta-analysis of conservation tillage management effects on soil organic carbon sequestration and soil greenhouse gas flux

Conservation tillage practices, including reduced tillage (RT), no-tillage (NT) and straw return (SR), have been widely adopted to enhance soil organic carbon density (PSOC) and improve the soil quality while mitigating the negative environmental impacts of intensive farming. However, current studies on the effects of these practices on SOC sequestration and N<sub>2</sub>O flux show considerable variability, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the individual and combined impacts of conservation tillage practices and introducing substantial uncertainty in estimating the agricultural sector's potential to mitigate climate change. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of 902 pairwise comparisons from 90 peer-reviewed publications to evaluate the effects of five conservation tillage practices (straw return (SR), reduced tillage (RT), no-tillage (NT), straw return combined with tillage reduction (SR + RT) and straw returning combined with no-tillage (SR + NT)) on C sequestration and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from agricultural soils. The results show that SR was the most effective practice for increasing SOC content (23.7 %), followed by RT + SR (5.5 %) and NT + SR (4.4 %). Additionally, RT (12.3 %) and NT (14.3 %) significantly reduced soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. This study also identified key drivers, including climatic factors, soil properties, and agricultural management practices, that influence SOC content and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions under different conservation tillage practices. For example, the mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature, soil type, pH, soil total nitrogen content, N application rate, and experiment duration were identified as the key factors affecting SOC content and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions Specifically, suitable temperature, lower rainfall and alkaline soil environment significantly enhanced the C sequestration efficiency of SR, while suitable climatic conditions and soil texture combined with an alkaline environment contributed to a significant reduction in long-term NT soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. These results provide a robust scientific foundation for the strategic implementation of conservation tillage to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate global warming, and enhance soil C sequestration capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176315
Citations
33
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A meta-analysis of conservation tillage management effects on soil organic carbon sequestration and soil greenhouse gas flux

Ennan Zheng, Tianyu Xu, Fanxiang Meng, Peng Chen et al.
33 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
11.01
article

A meta-analysis of conservation tillage management effects on soil organic carbon sequestration and soil greenhouse gas flux

Ennan Zheng, Tianyu Xu, Fanxiang Meng, Peng Chen, Xuanchen Meng, Dingmu Hou
article en
33 citations

Abstract

Conservation tillage practices, including reduced tillage (RT), no-tillage (NT) and straw return (SR), have been widely adopted to enhance soil organic carbon density (PSOC) and improve the soil quality while mitigating the negative environmental impacts of intensive farming. However, current studies on the effects of these practices on SOC sequestration and N<sub>2</sub>O flux show considerable variability, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the individual and combined impacts of conservation tillage practices and introducing substantial uncertainty in estimating the agricultural sector's potential to mitigate climate change. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of 902 pairwise comparisons from 90 peer-reviewed publications to evaluate the effects of five conservation tillage practices (straw return (SR), reduced tillage (RT), no-tillage (NT), straw return combined with tillage reduction (SR + RT) and straw returning combined with no-tillage (SR + NT)) on C sequestration and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from agricultural soils. The results show that SR was the most effective practice for increasing SOC content (23.7 %), followed by RT + SR (5.5 %) and NT + SR (4.4 %). Additionally, RT (12.3 %) and NT (14.3 %) significantly reduced soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. This study also identified key drivers, including climatic factors, soil properties, and agricultural management practices, that influence SOC content and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions under different conservation tillage practices. For example, the mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature, soil type, pH, soil total nitrogen content, N application rate, and experiment duration were identified as the key factors affecting SOC content and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions Specifically, suitable temperature, lower rainfall and alkaline soil environment significantly enhanced the C sequestration efficiency of SR, while suitable climatic conditions and soil texture combined with an alkaline environment contributed to a significant reduction in long-term NT soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. These results provide a robust scientific foundation for the strategic implementation of conservation tillage to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate global warming, and enhance soil C sequestration capacity.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 954
Hohai University (CN), Heilongjiang Electric Power Workers University (CN), Heilongjiang University (CN)
Heilongjiang University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
11.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.