GPP of a Chinese Savanna Ecosystem during Different Phenological Phases Simulated from Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Data

Savannas are widespread biomes with highly valued ecosystem services. To successfully manage savannas in the future, it is critical to better understand the long-term dynamics of their productivity and phenology. However, accurate large-scale gross primary productivity (GPP) estimation remains challenging because of the high spatial and seasonal variations in savanna GPP. China’s savanna ecosystems constitute only a small part of the world’s savanna ecosystems and are ecologically fragile. However, studies on GPP and phenological changes, while closely related to climate change, remain scarce. Therefore, we simulated savanna ecosystem GPP via a satellite-based vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) with fine-resolution harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 (HLS) imagery and derived savanna phenophases from phenocam images. From 2015 to 2018, we compared the GPP from HLS VPM (GPPHLS-VPM) simulations and that from Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) VPM simulations (GPPMODIS-VPM) with GPP estimates from an eddy covariance (EC) flux tower (GPPEC) in Yuanjiang, China. Moreover, the consistency of the savanna ecosystem GPP was validated for a conventional MODIS product (MOD17A2). This study clearly revealed the potential of the HLS VPM for estimating savanna GPP. Compared with the MODIS VPM, the HLS VPM yielded more accurate GPP estimates with lower root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and slopes closer to 1:1. Specifically, the annual RMSE values for the HLS VPM were 1.54 (2015), 2.65 (2016), 2.64 (2017), and 1.80 (2018), whereas those for the MODIS VPM were 3.04, 3.10, 2.62, and 2.49, respectively. The HLS VPM slopes were 1.12, 1.80, 1.65, and 1.27, indicating better agreement with the EC data than the MODIS VPM slopes of 2.04, 2.51, 2.14, and 1.54, respectively. Moreover, HLS VPM suitably indicated GPP dynamics during all phenophases, especially during the autumn green-down period. As the first study that simulates GPP involving HLS VPM and compares satellite-based and EC flux observations of the GPP in Chinese savanna ecosystems, our study enables better exploration of the Chinese savanna ecosystem GPP during different phenophases and more effective savanna management and conservation worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183475
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GPP of a Chinese Savanna Ecosystem during Different Phenological Phases Simulated from Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Data

X.-Z. Zhang, Gianluca Filippa, Dehua Qi, Shuai Xie et al.
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
article

GPP of a Chinese Savanna Ecosystem during Different Phenological Phases Simulated from Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Data

X.-Z. Zhang, Gianluca Filippa, Dehua Qi, Shuai Xie, Yiping Zhang, Qinghai Song
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Savannas are widespread biomes with highly valued ecosystem services. To successfully manage savannas in the future, it is critical to better understand the long-term dynamics of their productivity and phenology. However, accurate large-scale gross primary productivity (GPP) estimation remains challenging because of the high spatial and seasonal variations in savanna GPP. China’s savanna ecosystems constitute only a small part of the world’s savanna ecosystems and are ecologically fragile. However, studies on GPP and phenological changes, while closely related to climate change, remain scarce. Therefore, we simulated savanna ecosystem GPP via a satellite-based vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) with fine-resolution harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 (HLS) imagery and derived savanna phenophases from phenocam images. From 2015 to 2018, we compared the GPP from HLS VPM (GPPHLS-VPM) simulations and that from Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) VPM simulations (GPPMODIS-VPM) with GPP estimates from an eddy covariance (EC) flux tower (GPPEC) in Yuanjiang, China. Moreover, the consistency of the savanna ecosystem GPP was validated for a conventional MODIS product (MOD17A2). This study clearly revealed the potential of the HLS VPM for estimating savanna GPP. Compared with the MODIS VPM, the HLS VPM yielded more accurate GPP estimates with lower root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and slopes closer to 1:1. Specifically, the annual RMSE values for the HLS VPM were 1.54 (2015), 2.65 (2016), 2.64 (2017), and 1.80 (2018), whereas those for the MODIS VPM were 3.04, 3.10, 2.62, and 2.49, respectively. The HLS VPM slopes were 1.12, 1.80, 1.65, and 1.27, indicating better agreement with the EC data than the MODIS VPM slopes of 2.04, 2.51, 2.14, and 1.54, respectively. Moreover, HLS VPM suitably indicated GPP dynamics during all phenophases, especially during the autumn green-down period. As the first study that simulates GPP involving HLS VPM and compares satellite-based and EC flux observations of the GPP in Chinese savanna ecosystems, our study enables better exploration of the Chinese savanna ecosystem GPP during different phenophases and more effective savanna management and conservation worldwide.

Remote SensingVol. 16(18)
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte (IT), Yunnan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Qingdao University of Technology (CN)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Oklahoma, European Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Agricultural Research Service, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.