Turkish spelling errors by Turkish-Dutch bilingual children

The current pilot study adds to the small body of work focusing on Turkish-Dutch children's Turkish literacy attainment by investigating their spelling errors. This study deviates from the previous studies by attempting to find patterns behind the surface representation of errors (i.e. omission, substitution and addition). Fifty-three 10 to 12 year-old Turkish-Dutch bilingual children were asked to write Turkish narratives. The participants misspelled about half of the words. The errors in order of frequency were diacritic errors (i.e. confusing the graphemes with and without diacritics), orthographic ambiguity errors (i.e. phonetically spelling a word though it is not orthographically transparent), punctuation errors, capitalization errors, morphological errors (e.g. using a wrong allomorph of a suffix), spacing errors (e.g. writing two words as one), code-switching (i.e. utilizing Dutch words in Turkish sentences) and Dutch-influenced errors (i.e. using Dutch orthographic rules in Turkish such as spelling /j/ as <j> or /u/ as <oe>). The rest of the errors, which lacked a discernible pattern, were categorized as “other”. These results differed from the findings on Turkish monolingual children's spelling errors in the literature in some notable ways (e.g. the very high rate of misspelled words and the prevalence of diacritic errors).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ampersand
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100197
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkish spelling errors by Turkish-Dutch bilingual children

Treysi Terziyan
Ampersand
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Turkish spelling errors by Turkish-Dutch bilingual children

Treysi Terziyan
article en

Abstract

The current pilot study adds to the small body of work focusing on Turkish-Dutch children's Turkish literacy attainment by investigating their spelling errors. This study deviates from the previous studies by attempting to find patterns behind the surface representation of errors (i.e. omission, substitution and addition). Fifty-three 10 to 12 year-old Turkish-Dutch bilingual children were asked to write Turkish narratives. The participants misspelled about half of the words. The errors in order of frequency were diacritic errors (i.e. confusing the graphemes with and without diacritics), orthographic ambiguity errors (i.e. phonetically spelling a word though it is not orthographically transparent), punctuation errors, capitalization errors, morphological errors (e.g. using a wrong allomorph of a suffix), spacing errors (e.g. writing two words as one), code-switching (i.e. utilizing Dutch words in Turkish sentences) and Dutch-influenced errors (i.e. using Dutch orthographic rules in Turkish such as spelling /j/ as <j> or /u/ as <oe>). The rest of the errors, which lacked a discernible pattern, were categorized as “other”. These results differed from the findings on Turkish monolingual children's spelling errors in the literature in some notable ways (e.g. the very high rate of misspelled words and the prevalence of diacritic errors).

AmpersandVol. 13
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.