A Maneuver in the Trade-Off Space of Federated Learning Aggregation Frameworks Secured with Polymorphic Encryption: PolyFLAM and PolyFLAP Frameworks

Maintaining user privacy in machine learning is a critical concern due to the implications of data collection. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution by sharing trained models rather than user data. However, FL still faces several challenges, particularly in terms of security and privacy, such as vulnerability to inference attacks. There is an inherent trade-off between communication traffic across the network and computational costs on the server or client, which this paper aims to address by maneuvering between these performance parameters. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes two complementary frameworks: PolyFLAM (“Polymorphic Federated Learning Aggregation of Models”) and PolyFLAP (“Polymorphic Federated Learning Aggregation of Parameters”). These frameworks provide two options to suit the needs of users, depending on whether they prioritize reducing communication across the network or lowering computational costs on the server or client. PolyFLAM reduces computational costs by exchanging entire models, eliminating the need to rebuild models from parameters. In contrast, PolyFLAP reduces communication costs by transmitting only model parameters, which are smaller in size compared to entire models. Both frameworks are supported by polymorphic encryption, ensuring privacy is maintained even in cases of key leakage. Furthermore, these frameworks offer five different machine learning models, including support vector machines, logistic regression, Gaussian naïve Bayes, stochastic gradient descent, and multi-layer perceptron, to cover as many real-life problems as possible. The evaluation of these frameworks with simulated and real-life datasets demonstrated that they can effectively withstand various attacks, including inference attacks that aim to compromise user privacy by capturing exchanged models or parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183716
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Maneuver in the Trade-Off Space of Federated Learning Aggregation Frameworks Secured with Polymorphic Encryption: PolyFLAM and PolyFLAP Frameworks

Ali Raad, Mohammad Moshawrab, Hussein Ibrahim, Mehdi Adda et al.
Electronics
Cryptography and Data Security
article

A Maneuver in the Trade-Off Space of Federated Learning Aggregation Frameworks Secured with Polymorphic Encryption: PolyFLAM and PolyFLAP Frameworks

Ali Raad, Mohammad Moshawrab, Hussein Ibrahim, Mehdi Adda, Abdenour Bouzouane
article en

Abstract

Maintaining user privacy in machine learning is a critical concern due to the implications of data collection. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution by sharing trained models rather than user data. However, FL still faces several challenges, particularly in terms of security and privacy, such as vulnerability to inference attacks. There is an inherent trade-off between communication traffic across the network and computational costs on the server or client, which this paper aims to address by maneuvering between these performance parameters. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes two complementary frameworks: PolyFLAM (“Polymorphic Federated Learning Aggregation of Models”) and PolyFLAP (“Polymorphic Federated Learning Aggregation of Parameters”). These frameworks provide two options to suit the needs of users, depending on whether they prioritize reducing communication across the network or lowering computational costs on the server or client. PolyFLAM reduces computational costs by exchanging entire models, eliminating the need to rebuild models from parameters. In contrast, PolyFLAP reduces communication costs by transmitting only model parameters, which are smaller in size compared to entire models. Both frameworks are supported by polymorphic encryption, ensuring privacy is maintained even in cases of key leakage. Furthermore, these frameworks offer five different machine learning models, including support vector machines, logistic regression, Gaussian naïve Bayes, stochastic gradient descent, and multi-layer perceptron, to cover as many real-life problems as possible. The evaluation of these frameworks with simulated and real-life datasets demonstrated that they can effectively withstand various attacks, including inference attacks that aim to compromise user privacy by capturing exchanged models or parameters.

ElectronicsVol. 13(18)
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA), Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), Cegep de Sept Iles (CA), Islamic University of Lebanon (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.