Runoff and erosion mitigation via conservation tillage and cover crops - derivation of model input parameters from literature

Runoff and hydric soil erosion from agricultural fields may lead to a transfer of plant protection products (PPP) to adjacent surface water bodies, in addition to the intrinsic losses of water and topsoil material for plant production. Measures of conservation agriculture are known to be suitable for mitigating these processes. In this study, the pertinent literature on runoff and erosion mitigation following the application of measures from the conservation agriculture toolbox was reviewed to determine the reduction effects of distinct strategies of conservation tillage and the use of cover crops. In total, 1483 and 1076 single data points were considered for runoff and erosion, respectively. We calculated geometric means (with confidence intervals expressed by the geometric SD factor) of the ratios of quantities derived from treated vs. untreated setups following no-tillage of 0.44 [0.17–1.13; n= 38 studies] and 0.11 [0.03–0.93; n= 37] for runoff and erosion, respectively. Conservation tillage measures other than no-tillage (i.e., reduced tillage, e.g., strip tillage) led to ratios of 0.46 [0.22–0.94; n =42] and 0.18 [0.06–1.16; n =35]. The use of cover crops resulted in ratios of 0.41 [0.19–0.88; n =33] and 0.09 [0.01–0.65; n =30]. Corresponding runoff curve numbers to be included in numerical simulations were calculated to be reduced by 11 % [5 %–25 %; n =16], 10 % [4 %–21 %; n =21], and 12 % [5 %–30 %; n =19], for the three categories of conservation agriculture (no-till, reduced-till, cover crops), respectively. That is equivalent to absolute reductions of the CN scores by 7 [4–13], 5 [2–13], and 5 [2–12]. Analogous PPP transport ratios of treated vs. non-treated are 0.50 [0.13–1.92; n =19], 0.70 [0.29–1.70; n =11], and 0.46 [0.12–1.80; n =4], respectively. This work broadens the database to include no-tillage, conservation tillage and cover crops into the framework of environmental exposure assessment for the registration of plant protection products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.101015
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Runoff and erosion mitigation via conservation tillage and cover crops - derivation of model input parameters from literature

Robin Sur, Stephan Sittig
8 citations
Environmental Challenges
Soil erosion and sediment transport
2.67
article

Runoff and erosion mitigation via conservation tillage and cover crops - derivation of model input parameters from literature

Robin Sur, Stephan Sittig
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Runoff and hydric soil erosion from agricultural fields may lead to a transfer of plant protection products (PPP) to adjacent surface water bodies, in addition to the intrinsic losses of water and topsoil material for plant production. Measures of conservation agriculture are known to be suitable for mitigating these processes. In this study, the pertinent literature on runoff and erosion mitigation following the application of measures from the conservation agriculture toolbox was reviewed to determine the reduction effects of distinct strategies of conservation tillage and the use of cover crops. In total, 1483 and 1076 single data points were considered for runoff and erosion, respectively. We calculated geometric means (with confidence intervals expressed by the geometric SD factor) of the ratios of quantities derived from treated vs. untreated setups following no-tillage of 0.44 [0.17–1.13; n= 38 studies] and 0.11 [0.03–0.93; n= 37] for runoff and erosion, respectively. Conservation tillage measures other than no-tillage (i.e., reduced tillage, e.g., strip tillage) led to ratios of 0.46 [0.22–0.94; n =42] and 0.18 [0.06–1.16; n =35]. The use of cover crops resulted in ratios of 0.41 [0.19–0.88; n =33] and 0.09 [0.01–0.65; n =30]. Corresponding runoff curve numbers to be included in numerical simulations were calculated to be reduced by 11 % [5 %–25 %; n =16], 10 % [4 %–21 %; n =21], and 12 % [5 %–30 %; n =19], for the three categories of conservation agriculture (no-till, reduced-till, cover crops), respectively. That is equivalent to absolute reductions of the CN scores by 7 [4–13], 5 [2–13], and 5 [2–12]. Analogous PPP transport ratios of treated vs. non-treated are 0.50 [0.13–1.92; n =19], 0.70 [0.29–1.70; n =11], and 0.46 [0.12–1.80; n =4], respectively. This work broadens the database to include no-tillage, conservation tillage and cover crops into the framework of environmental exposure assessment for the registration of plant protection products.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 17
Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.