Setting factors associated with licensed psychotherapists’ interest in the implementation of electroencephalogram neurofeedback into practice.

Neurofeedback has been utilized to treat a variety of mental health issues by influencing brainwave patterns using auditory and/or visual feedback. Despite a plethora of research, there is a significant gap regarding why neurofeedback is not more commonly utilized in mental health care practice. This study sought to address this gap by posing the question: <i>What factors are associated with psychotherapists</i>' <i>self-reported interest in adopting neurofeedback into their current practice?</i> This study utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore factors associated with outpatient psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback in their practices. The primary variables of interest were years in practice, cost as the main barrier to implementation, and type of practice setting. Surveys were completed online by licensed psychotherapists (<i>N</i> = 500). A logistic regression analysis found that, compared to those practicing in a solo private practice, psychotherapists practicing in community mental health clinics/agencies (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, [0.99, 3.15], <i>p</i> = .0524) and other outpatient settings (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], <i>p</i> = .0708) had higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. Finally, compared to those who did not believe that neurofeedback would be welcome in their practice setting or were unsure, those who reported believing neurofeedback would be welcome (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], <i>p</i> < .0001) had much higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. This study found that inner setting factors had the most significant association with psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback. These findings point to potential areas of focus to increase the uptake of neurofeedback in mental health care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Practice Innovations
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000256
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Setting factors associated with licensed psychotherapists’ interest in the implementation of electroencephalogram neurofeedback into practice.

Whitney K Norris, Geoffrey M. Curran, Ellen Shaw-Smith, George Pro et al.
1 citations
Practice Innovations
Educational and Psychological Assessments
0.79
article

Setting factors associated with licensed psychotherapists’ interest in the implementation of electroencephalogram neurofeedback into practice.

Whitney K Norris, Geoffrey M. Curran, Ellen Shaw-Smith, George Pro, Martha Rojo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Neurofeedback has been utilized to treat a variety of mental health issues by influencing brainwave patterns using auditory and/or visual feedback. Despite a plethora of research, there is a significant gap regarding why neurofeedback is not more commonly utilized in mental health care practice. This study sought to address this gap by posing the question: <i>What factors are associated with psychotherapists</i>' <i>self-reported interest in adopting neurofeedback into their current practice?</i> This study utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore factors associated with outpatient psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback in their practices. The primary variables of interest were years in practice, cost as the main barrier to implementation, and type of practice setting. Surveys were completed online by licensed psychotherapists (<i>N</i> = 500). A logistic regression analysis found that, compared to those practicing in a solo private practice, psychotherapists practicing in community mental health clinics/agencies (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, [0.99, 3.15], <i>p</i> = .0524) and other outpatient settings (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], <i>p</i> = .0708) had higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. Finally, compared to those who did not believe that neurofeedback would be welcome in their practice setting or were unsure, those who reported believing neurofeedback would be welcome (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], <i>p</i> < .0001) had much higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. This study found that inner setting factors had the most significant association with psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback. These findings point to potential areas of focus to increase the uptake of neurofeedback in mental health care settings.

Practice InnovationsVol. 10(1)
VentureWell (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.