Confirmatory information seeking is robust in psychologists’ diagnostic reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000574
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confirmatory information seeking is robust in psychologists’ diagnostic reasoning.

Daniel C. Murrie, Tess M. S. Neal, Nina MacLean, Robert D. Morgan
2 citations
Law and Human Behavior
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.01
article

Confirmatory information seeking is robust in psychologists’ diagnostic reasoning.

Daniel C. Murrie, Tess M. S. Neal, Nina MacLean, Robert D. Morgan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human BehaviorVol. 48(5-6)
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (US), Iowa State University (US), Southern Illinois University System (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Confirmatory information seeking is robust in psychologists’ diagnostic reasoning. — Daniel C. Murrie, Tess M. S. Neal, et al. · Law and Human Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS