Comments to the Editor on “The Willingness to Pay for Diversification”

Mahmoud [ Mahmoud O (2022) The willingness to pay for diversification. Management Sci. 68(8):6235–6249] presents experimental evidence showing that people have an intrinsic preference for diversification that is driven by risk aversion and loss aversion, with risk-averse and loss-averse individuals being more willing to pay for diversification. We document numerous discrepancies between the results reported in the paper and the results calculated from the experimental data. In particular, the data show that risk-averse individuals are actually less willing to pay for diversification, whereas the effect of loss aversion is nonmonotonic and not statistically significant. We thus show that the data do not support the paper’s claim of a preference for diversification driven by risk aversion and loss aversion. This paper was accepted by Tomasz Piskorski, finance. Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the OP Group Research Foundation [Grants 20220057 and 20220089]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01581 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01581
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comments to the Editor on “The Willingness to Pay for Diversification”

Aleksi Pitkäjärvi, Matteo Vacca
Management Science
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Comments to the Editor on “The Willingness to Pay for Diversification”

Aleksi Pitkäjärvi, Matteo Vacca
article en

Abstract

Mahmoud [ Mahmoud O (2022) The willingness to pay for diversification. Management Sci. 68(8):6235–6249] presents experimental evidence showing that people have an intrinsic preference for diversification that is driven by risk aversion and loss aversion, with risk-averse and loss-averse individuals being more willing to pay for diversification. We document numerous discrepancies between the results reported in the paper and the results calculated from the experimental data. In particular, the data show that risk-averse individuals are actually less willing to pay for diversification, whereas the effect of loss aversion is nonmonotonic and not statistically significant. We thus show that the data do not support the paper’s claim of a preference for diversification driven by risk aversion and loss aversion. This paper was accepted by Tomasz Piskorski, finance. Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the OP Group Research Foundation [Grants 20220057 and 20220089]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01581 .

Management ScienceVol. 71(6)
Tinbergen Institute (NL), Hanken School of Economics (FI), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comments to the Editor on “The Willingness to Pay for Diversification” — Aleksi Pitkäjärvi, Matteo Vacca · Management Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS