Critical analysis of replacing dark matter and dark energy with a model of stochastic spacetime

Abstract We analyze consequences of trying to replace dark matter and dark energy with models of stochastic spacetime. In particular, we analyze the model put forth by ref. [1], in which it is claimed that “post-quantum classical gravity” (PQCG), a stochastic theory of gravity, leads to modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) behavior on galactic scales that reproduces galactic rotation curves, and leads to dark energy. We show that this analysis has four basic problems: (i) the equations of PQCG do not lead to a new large scale force of the form claimed in the paper, (ii) the form claimed is not of the MONDian form anyhow and so does not correspond to observed galactic dynamics, (iii) the spectrum of fluctuations is very different from observations, and (iv) we also identify some theoretical problems in these models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical analysis of replacing dark matter and dark energy with a model of stochastic spacetime

Mark P. Hertzberg, Abraham Loeb
1 citations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
0.33
article

Critical analysis of replacing dark matter and dark energy with a model of stochastic spacetime

Mark P. Hertzberg, Abraham Loeb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We analyze consequences of trying to replace dark matter and dark energy with models of stochastic spacetime. In particular, we analyze the model put forth by ref. [1], in which it is claimed that “post-quantum classical gravity” (PQCG), a stochastic theory of gravity, leads to modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) behavior on galactic scales that reproduces galactic rotation curves, and leads to dark energy. We show that this analysis has four basic problems: (i) the equations of PQCG do not lead to a new large scale force of the form claimed in the paper, (ii) the form claimed is not of the MONDian form anyhow and so does not correspond to observed galactic dynamics, (iii) the spectrum of fluctuations is very different from observations, and (iv) we also identify some theoretical problems in these models.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2024(09)
Tufts University (US), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.