Effects of Stimulus Intensity and Sweep Count on the Click- and Chirp-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response

Purpose: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) can be elicited by broadband stimuli such as the click and chirp. Differences in the click- and chirp-evoked ABR have been extensively described using subjective analyses. The aim of the current research is to determine if subjectively observed differences between the click- and chirp-evoked ABR are also represented in objective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements obtained from these responses at different stimulus intensities and sweep counts. Method: ABRs were collected using click and chirp stimuli on nine adults with normal hearing sensitivity. Three SNR methods (split-sweep average–based SNR [SSA-SNR], F ratio–based single-point [Fsp], and multipoint [Fmp]) were used for the objective analysis of the waveforms at four stimulus intensities (20, 40, 60, and 80 dB nHL) and five sweep counts (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 sweeps). Results: SSA-SNR measurements were statistically stronger for chirp- as compared to click-evoked ABRs. Additionally, chirp/click SSA-SNR, Fsp, and Fmp ratio measurements were consistently greater than 1. The advantage associated with the chirp was most noticeable at moderate stimulus intensities for all three measurements. Discussion: The advantages for the chirp observed here could have implications for threshold estimation and screening ABR tests. Furthermore, when stimulus intensity and sweep count were varied, general response trends suggest that the three SNR-based methods performed similarly to each other, as well as to traditionally used subjective measures, suggesting that these techniques have the potential to be used effectively in clinic. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27011461

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-24-00097
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Stimulus Intensity and Sweep Count on the Click- and Chirp-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response

Saradha Ananthakrishnan, Katherine Peitsch, Rafael E. Delgado, Madeline Campbell
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Effects of Stimulus Intensity and Sweep Count on the Click- and Chirp-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response

Saradha Ananthakrishnan, Katherine Peitsch, Rafael E. Delgado, Madeline Campbell
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) can be elicited by broadband stimuli such as the click and chirp. Differences in the click- and chirp-evoked ABR have been extensively described using subjective analyses. The aim of the current research is to determine if subjectively observed differences between the click- and chirp-evoked ABR are also represented in objective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements obtained from these responses at different stimulus intensities and sweep counts. Method: ABRs were collected using click and chirp stimuli on nine adults with normal hearing sensitivity. Three SNR methods (split-sweep average–based SNR [SSA-SNR], F ratio–based single-point [Fsp], and multipoint [Fmp]) were used for the objective analysis of the waveforms at four stimulus intensities (20, 40, 60, and 80 dB nHL) and five sweep counts (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 sweeps). Results: SSA-SNR measurements were statistically stronger for chirp- as compared to click-evoked ABRs. Additionally, chirp/click SSA-SNR, Fsp, and Fmp ratio measurements were consistently greater than 1. The advantage associated with the chirp was most noticeable at moderate stimulus intensities for all three measurements. Discussion: The advantages for the chirp observed here could have implications for threshold estimation and screening ABR tests. Furthermore, when stimulus intensity and sweep count were varied, general response trends suggest that the three SNR-based methods performed similarly to each other, as well as to traditionally used subjective measures, suggesting that these techniques have the potential to be used effectively in clinic. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27011461

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest GroupsVol. 9(5)
Intelligent Hearing Systems (United States) (US), Towson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.