Differential Bunching Impacts Across the Income Distribution: Evidence from Tax Administrative Data

Abstract We investigate the behavioural responses of individual taxpayers to changes in marginal personal income tax rates applying empirical bunching methodology to tax administrative data from Zambia over the period from 2014 to 2021. We find evidence for excess bunching at the first kink in the tax schedule for all years but less evidence of bunching at the second and third thresholds. While bunching is considerable and behavioural responses are observed to changes in the location of the kinks over time, bunching at reference points (’round-number bunching’) also appears large. Implied elasticities of taxable income are however not remarkable, and comparing actual and estimated counterfactual wage distributions reveal that missed tax revenue arising from the excess bunching is limited. This is consistent with the observed bunching reacting sharply and immediately to changes in the location of the kink points over time, suggesting that observed behavioural change is driven by reporting behaviour rather than real economic responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Development Research
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-024-00660-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Bunching Impacts Across the Income Distribution: Evidence from Tax Administrative Data

Kwabena Adu-Ababio, John Rand, Evaristo Mwale, S. M. Bryson
1 citations
European Journal of Development Research
Taxation and Compliance Studies
1.13
article

Differential Bunching Impacts Across the Income Distribution: Evidence from Tax Administrative Data

Kwabena Adu-Ababio, John Rand, Evaristo Mwale, S. M. Bryson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the behavioural responses of individual taxpayers to changes in marginal personal income tax rates applying empirical bunching methodology to tax administrative data from Zambia over the period from 2014 to 2021. We find evidence for excess bunching at the first kink in the tax schedule for all years but less evidence of bunching at the second and third thresholds. While bunching is considerable and behavioural responses are observed to changes in the location of the kinks over time, bunching at reference points (’round-number bunching’) also appears large. Implied elasticities of taxable income are however not remarkable, and comparing actual and estimated counterfactual wage distributions reveal that missed tax revenue arising from the excess bunching is limited. This is consistent with the observed bunching reacting sharply and immediately to changes in the location of the kink points over time, suggesting that observed behavioural change is driven by reporting behaviour rather than real economic responses.

European Journal of Development ResearchVol. 37(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (FI), Department of Social Sciences (RU)
Københavns Universitet, University of South Africa, United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research
Decent work and economic growth, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.