Farm dams and the need for integrated water storage safety, equity and land-use policy: Comparative case study evidence from Australia

Farm dams that are not planned, designed and managed properly at the individual level can create water storage safety, equity and land-use planning threats to downstream communities and the environment that aggregate at the catchment level. The paper extends previous research and understanding into this threefold phenomenon by exploring the integrated policy needs within the Australian setting. This is achieved through comparative case studies involving assessments of farm dam policies and their integration, and on-site audit-style surveys of dam management practices that are related to the policies in two state jurisdictions, South Australia and Tasmania. These case studies represent weak versus strong farm dam safety, equity and land-use regulatory policies and integration. Survey results in South Australia find most hazardous farm dams studied are not built or maintained to an adequate standard and spillways are blocked and/or under-designed. This results in potentially storing more water than entitled and creating unsafe dams and potential water sharing equity and land-use planning threats at both the individual and cumulative levels in catchments. Survey results in Tasmania are in contrast and hence this state serves as an exemplar of feasible 3-fold integrated policy that is performing effectively. Analysis of results against international regulatory benchmarks finds that in addition to Tasmania's model there are other regulatory options that may better suit different jurisdictions, and cost-effective tools to help integrated policy implementation are also available. Based on these findings policy recommendations for South Australia are made. The paper represents indicative lessons and guidance for any jurisdiction internationally with similar circumstances on how to design suitable integrated policy that helps farm dams and proximate land-use be developed and managed safely and equitably. • Farm dams not planned, designed or managed properly create threats downstream. • Comparative case studies and on-site surveys contrast two Australian states. • Weak versus strong dam management policy integration with land use planning found. • Increased unsafe and unfair water storage and development evident in weak settings. • Guidance to similar jurisdictions internationally for sustainable farm dams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143707
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farm dams and the need for integrated water storage safety, equity and land-use policy: Comparative case study evidence from Australia

John D. Pisaniello, Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak
1 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Water resources management and optimization
0.34
article

Farm dams and the need for integrated water storage safety, equity and land-use policy: Comparative case study evidence from Australia

John D. Pisaniello, Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Farm dams that are not planned, designed and managed properly at the individual level can create water storage safety, equity and land-use planning threats to downstream communities and the environment that aggregate at the catchment level. The paper extends previous research and understanding into this threefold phenomenon by exploring the integrated policy needs within the Australian setting. This is achieved through comparative case studies involving assessments of farm dam policies and their integration, and on-site audit-style surveys of dam management practices that are related to the policies in two state jurisdictions, South Australia and Tasmania. These case studies represent weak versus strong farm dam safety, equity and land-use regulatory policies and integration. Survey results in South Australia find most hazardous farm dams studied are not built or maintained to an adequate standard and spillways are blocked and/or under-designed. This results in potentially storing more water than entitled and creating unsafe dams and potential water sharing equity and land-use planning threats at both the individual and cumulative levels in catchments. Survey results in Tasmania are in contrast and hence this state serves as an exemplar of feasible 3-fold integrated policy that is performing effectively. Analysis of results against international regulatory benchmarks finds that in addition to Tasmania's model there are other regulatory options that may better suit different jurisdictions, and cost-effective tools to help integrated policy implementation are also available. Based on these findings policy recommendations for South Australia are made. The paper represents indicative lessons and guidance for any jurisdiction internationally with similar circumstances on how to design suitable integrated policy that helps farm dams and proximate land-use be developed and managed safely and equitably. • Farm dams not planned, designed or managed properly create threats downstream. • Comparative case studies and on-site surveys contrast two Australian states. • Weak versus strong dam management policy integration with land use planning found. • Increased unsafe and unfair water storage and development evident in weak settings. • Guidance to similar jurisdictions internationally for sustainable farm dams.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 476
University of South Australia (AU)
Australian Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Water resources management and optimization
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.