Fortifying NLP models against poisoning attacks: The power of personalized prediction architectures

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), state-of-the-art machine learning models heavily depend on vast amounts of training data. Often, this data is sourced from third parties, such as crowdsourcing platforms, to enable swift and efficient annotation collection for supervised learning. Yet, such an approach is susceptible to poisoning attacks where malicious agents deliberately insert harmful data to skew the resulting model behavior. Current countermeasures to these attacks either come at a significant cost, lack full efficacy, or are simply non-applicable. This study introduces and evaluates the potential of personalized model architectures as a defense against these threats. By comparing two top-performing personalized model architectures, User-ID and HuBi-Medium, against a standard non-personalized baseline across two NLP tasks and various simulated attack scenarios, we found that the personalized model architectures significantly outperformed the baseline. The robustness advantage increased with the rise in malicious annotations. Notably, the User-ID model excelled in safeguarding predictions for legitimate users from the influence of malicious annotations. Our findings emphasize the benefit of adopting personalized model architectures to bolster NLP system defenses against poisoning attacks. • NLP models are vulnerable to malicious poisoning attacks. • Current defenses against attacks are limited and often costly. • Personalized NLP architectures bolster defense against these threats. • User-ID excels in protecting legitimate users from malicious data. • Personalized models outperform standard ones during high-level attacks.