Barriers and enablers: How logistics companies could tackle the transition to electrified road freight transport

• Identification of three types of prerequisites for logistics companies for enabling transition to electrified road freight: comparable logistics performance, understanding effect on cost, and planning for charging. • Combine obstacles into four groups of barriers, including practical and technological, financial, institutional, and cultural and social. • Description of three strategies to cope with the barriers: quantification of loss of logistics, differentiate transport systems into subsystems, and collaboration as a response. Electrifying road freight transport can heavily reduce the sector’s climate impact; however, there exist many uncertainties for making a large-scale transition, especially for logistics companies. In response, the purpose of this article is to identify and describe barriers to transition, but also strategies for how the barriers can be managed. To address the purpose, an interview study was carried out together with two complementary workshops to capture the views of relevant actors. Barriers to electrification are clustered into four separate areas: practical and technological barriers, financial barriers, institutional barriers, and social and cultural barriers. Low cost and high logistics performance are viewed as logistics companies’ competitive advantages, but they are expected to be challenged when making the transition. The current structure of the transport chain also further complicates things: it is transaction-based and risks and benefits can occur in its different parts. This is an issue, since the actor that is forced to take risks is not always the actor that benefits the most. One way to manage this is for actors to form more long-term commitments through collaborations. Moreover, it can be advantageous to start electrifying subsystems that can be described as ‘closed’ and ‘static’, i.e. predictable and easy to control, such as transport between terminals. At the other end of the spectrum, subsystems that are ‘open’ and ‘dynamic’ are the ones that are most difficult to electrify.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100172
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and enablers: How logistics companies could tackle the transition to electrified road freight transport

Henrik Gillström
7 citations
Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
article

Barriers and enablers: How logistics companies could tackle the transition to electrified road freight transport

Henrik Gillström
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Identification of three types of prerequisites for logistics companies for enabling transition to electrified road freight: comparable logistics performance, understanding effect on cost, and planning for charging. • Combine obstacles into four groups of barriers, including practical and technological, financial, institutional, and cultural and social. • Description of three strategies to cope with the barriers: quantification of loss of logistics, differentiate transport systems into subsystems, and collaboration as a response. Electrifying road freight transport can heavily reduce the sector’s climate impact; however, there exist many uncertainties for making a large-scale transition, especially for logistics companies. In response, the purpose of this article is to identify and describe barriers to transition, but also strategies for how the barriers can be managed. To address the purpose, an interview study was carried out together with two complementary workshops to capture the views of relevant actors. Barriers to electrification are clustered into four separate areas: practical and technological barriers, financial barriers, institutional barriers, and social and cultural barriers. Low cost and high logistics performance are viewed as logistics companies’ competitive advantages, but they are expected to be challenged when making the transition. The current structure of the transport chain also further complicates things: it is transaction-based and risks and benefits can occur in its different parts. This is an issue, since the actor that is forced to take risks is not always the actor that benefits the most. One way to manage this is for actors to form more long-term commitments through collaborations. Moreover, it can be advantageous to start electrifying subsystems that can be described as ‘closed’ and ‘static’, i.e. predictable and easy to control, such as transport between terminals. At the other end of the spectrum, subsystems that are ‘open’ and ‘dynamic’ are the ones that are most difficult to electrify.

Cleaner Logistics and Supply ChainVol. 13
Linköping University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Barriers and enablers: How logistics companies could tackle the transition to electrified road freight transport — Henrik Gillström · Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS