Creativity, embodiment, and COVID-19: Discovering new research horizons under methodological and environmental constraints

COVID-19 has been a powerful reminder of the role that our bodies and physical context play in our lives. The pandemic revealed that human embodiment and many ways creative cognition is affected by the physical world and environmental constraints remain among the least understood aspects in the psychology of creativity, where creativity tends to be presented as an individual’s mental ability. In this autoethnographic article, I reflect on how restrictions and methodological constraints that I, as a researcher, experienced during the pandemic have informed five insights about the domain of my scientific inquiry. Through these five takeaways from the pandemic, I sketch a new picture of the creative process—a process that is situated, embodied, tool-mediated, and collaborative. I emphasize the importance of acting on opportunities amid a crisis and outline promising research directions for future creativity scholars across disciplinary borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Possibility Studies & Society
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241273734
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creativity, embodiment, and COVID-19: Discovering new research horizons under methodological and environmental constraints

Alla Gubenko
Possibility Studies & Society
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Creativity, embodiment, and COVID-19: Discovering new research horizons under methodological and environmental constraints

Alla Gubenko
article en

Abstract

COVID-19 has been a powerful reminder of the role that our bodies and physical context play in our lives. The pandemic revealed that human embodiment and many ways creative cognition is affected by the physical world and environmental constraints remain among the least understood aspects in the psychology of creativity, where creativity tends to be presented as an individual’s mental ability. In this autoethnographic article, I reflect on how restrictions and methodological constraints that I, as a researcher, experienced during the pandemic have informed five insights about the domain of my scientific inquiry. Through these five takeaways from the pandemic, I sketch a new picture of the creative process—a process that is situated, embodied, tool-mediated, and collaborative. I emphasize the importance of acting on opportunities amid a crisis and outline promising research directions for future creativity scholars across disciplinary borders.

Possibility Studies & SocietyVol. 3(1)
Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.