Design requirements for human UHF magnets from the perspective of MRI scientists

Abstract The highest magnetic field strength for human-sized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) currently lies at 11.7 tesla. Given the opportunities for enhanced sensitivity and improved data quality at higher static magnetic fields, several initiatives around the world are pursuing the implementation of further human MRI systems at or above 11.7 tesla. In general, members of the magnetic resonance (MR) research community are not experts on magnet technology. However, the magnet is the technological heart of any MR system, and the MRI community is challenging the magnet research and design community to fulfill the current engineering gap in implementing large-bore, highly homogeneous and stabile magnets at field strengths that go beyond the performance capability of niobium–titanium. In this article, we present an overview of magnet design for such systems from the perspective of MR scientists. The underlying motivation and need for higher magnetic fields are briefly introduced, and system design considerations for the magnet as well as for the MRI subsystems such as the gradients, the shimming arrangement, and the radiofrequency hardware are presented. Finally, important limitations to higher magnetic fields from physiological considerations are described, operating under the assumption that any engineering or economic barriers to realizing such systems will be overcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Superconductor Science and Technology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad7d3f
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Wireless Body Area Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design requirements for human UHF magnets from the perspective of MRI scientists

Klaus Scheffler, Mark E. Ladd, Oliver Speck, Harald H. Quick
6 citations
Superconductor Science and Technology
Wireless Body Area Networks
1.11
article

Design requirements for human UHF magnets from the perspective of MRI scientists

Klaus Scheffler, Mark E. Ladd, Oliver Speck, Harald H. Quick
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The highest magnetic field strength for human-sized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) currently lies at 11.7 tesla. Given the opportunities for enhanced sensitivity and improved data quality at higher static magnetic fields, several initiatives around the world are pursuing the implementation of further human MRI systems at or above 11.7 tesla. In general, members of the magnetic resonance (MR) research community are not experts on magnet technology. However, the magnet is the technological heart of any MR system, and the MRI community is challenging the magnet research and design community to fulfill the current engineering gap in implementing large-bore, highly homogeneous and stabile magnets at field strengths that go beyond the performance capability of niobium–titanium. In this article, we present an overview of magnet design for such systems from the perspective of MR scientists. The underlying motivation and need for higher magnetic fields are briefly introduced, and system design considerations for the magnet as well as for the MRI subsystems such as the gradients, the shimming arrangement, and the radiofrequency hardware are presented. Finally, important limitations to higher magnetic fields from physiological considerations are described, operating under the assumption that any engineering or economic barriers to realizing such systems will be overcome.

Superconductor Science and TechnologyVol. 37(11)
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE), Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Wireless Body Area Networks
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.