Enhancing source apportionment of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus through integrating PMF and observed source profiles in a subtropical river

Apportioning pollution sources under compound pollution conditions is challenging in river pollution source analysis. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model is widely used to analyze river pollution sources. However, the identification of pollutants in this model relies primarily on the subjective experience of the researchers, leading to ineffective identification of different contaminants from similar sources. In this study, we propose a comprehensive deviation index (CDI) to quantitatively identify pollution source types based on the PMF and observed source profiles. Taking the subtropical Xizhijiang River Basin as a case study, we quantitatively identified the pollution sources and their contributions to dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) using observed water quality and pollution sources data. The results showed that the eight major pollutants in the study region exhibited significant positive correlations, indicating the similarity of pollutant sources in the watershed. The PMF model identified three primary pollution sources with coefficients of determination for observed versus predicted concentrations ranging from 0.60 to 0.98. The CDI unveiled that the watershed's three pollution sources were farmland, rural, and wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). Farmland emerges as the predominant contributor to DOC (68.04 %), TC (63.29 %), and TDP (44.51 %). Rural notably contributes to NH<sub>3</sub>-N, PO<sub>4</sub> <sup>3-</sup>, TDP, and TN, with percentages of 86.37 %, 57.65 %, 41.40 %, and 30.45 %, respectively. WTPs significantly contribute to NO<sub>2</sub> <sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub> <sup>-</sup>, and TN, accounting for 71.81 %, 57.39 %, and 37.26 %, respectively. Incorporating source fingerprints into the PMF model, the CDI can accurately identify pollution sources, improve the interpretability of source identification, and mitigate uncertainty in the multiple-source unknown receptor model. These findings have immediate and practical implications for river ecosystem management and pollution control, providing a more effective method for identifying and addressing pollution sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38190
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing source apportionment of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus through integrating PMF and observed source profiles in a subtropical river

Hao Cheng, Weijun Gao, Min Cao, Yajing Sheng et al.
13 citations
Heliyon
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
4.09
article

Enhancing source apportionment of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus through integrating PMF and observed source profiles in a subtropical river

Hao Cheng, Weijun Gao, Min Cao, Yajing Sheng, Yanpeng Cai
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Apportioning pollution sources under compound pollution conditions is challenging in river pollution source analysis. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) model is widely used to analyze river pollution sources. However, the identification of pollutants in this model relies primarily on the subjective experience of the researchers, leading to ineffective identification of different contaminants from similar sources. In this study, we propose a comprehensive deviation index (CDI) to quantitatively identify pollution source types based on the PMF and observed source profiles. Taking the subtropical Xizhijiang River Basin as a case study, we quantitatively identified the pollution sources and their contributions to dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) using observed water quality and pollution sources data. The results showed that the eight major pollutants in the study region exhibited significant positive correlations, indicating the similarity of pollutant sources in the watershed. The PMF model identified three primary pollution sources with coefficients of determination for observed versus predicted concentrations ranging from 0.60 to 0.98. The CDI unveiled that the watershed's three pollution sources were farmland, rural, and wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). Farmland emerges as the predominant contributor to DOC (68.04 %), TC (63.29 %), and TDP (44.51 %). Rural notably contributes to NH<sub>3</sub>-N, PO<sub>4</sub> <sup>3-</sup>, TDP, and TN, with percentages of 86.37 %, 57.65 %, 41.40 %, and 30.45 %, respectively. WTPs significantly contribute to NO<sub>2</sub> <sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub> <sup>-</sup>, and TN, accounting for 71.81 %, 57.39 %, and 37.26 %, respectively. Incorporating source fingerprints into the PMF model, the CDI can accurately identify pollution sources, improve the interpretability of source identification, and mitigate uncertainty in the multiple-source unknown receptor model. These findings have immediate and practical implications for river ecosystem management and pollution control, providing a more effective method for identifying and addressing pollution sources.

HeliyonVol. 10(18)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
4.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.