Comparison of oral caffeine and oral theophylline for apnea of prematurity: A randomized clinical trial

Background Caffeine and theophylline are methylxanthine compounds that have been widely used in the treatment of apnea of prematurity (AOP). Previous studies comparing the two agents have shown inconsistent results and have mostly used intravenous preparations. Objective To assess the effectiveness of oral administration of caffeine compared to oral theophylline as therapy for apnea of prematurity. Methods Fifty consecutively recruited premature neonates (gestational age 28-34 weeks, birth weight <2,500 g) with AOP who were able to tolerate at least 10 mL/kg of enteral feeding were randomized to receive either oral caffeine or oral theophylline for seven days. The main outcome was the daily frequency of apnea after treatment. Secondary outcomes were duration of oxygen or CPAP administration, duration of oxygen fraction (FiO2) taper to reach 21%, time to achievement of full feeding tolerance, length of hospital stay, and side effects. Results We randomized 25 subjects into each group. The distribution of baseline characteristics (gender, gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight and length, age at onset of AOP, and initial frequency of AOP) was similar between both groups. The mean daily number of apnea episodes after treatment was significantly higher in the caffeine group compared to the theophylline group [3.16 (SD 1.31) vs. 2.28 (SD 1.40); P=0.031]. The caffeine group, compared to the theophylline group, also had a longer mean duration of oxygen or CPAP use [12.56 (SD 7.67) days vs. 8.40 (SD 6.41) days; P=0.030] and duration of FiO2 taper [5.76 (SD 2.68) vs. 4.08 (SD 2.54); P=0.035]. There were no significant differences in mean time to full feeding and mean length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of side effects between the two groups. Conclusion In premature neonates with AOP, oral theophylline is slightly more effective than oral caffeine in reducing the frequency of apnea and is associated with a shorter duration of oxygen or CPAP use and duration to reach 21% FiO2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Paediatrica Indonesiana
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14238/pi64.4.2024.350-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of oral caffeine and oral theophylline for apnea of prematurity: A randomized clinical trial

Adhie Nur Radityo Suswihardhyono, Gatot Irawan Sarosa, Nensy Anggrainy
1 citations
Paediatrica Indonesiana
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
0.42
article

Comparison of oral caffeine and oral theophylline for apnea of prematurity: A randomized clinical trial

Adhie Nur Radityo Suswihardhyono, Gatot Irawan Sarosa, Nensy Anggrainy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Caffeine and theophylline are methylxanthine compounds that have been widely used in the treatment of apnea of prematurity (AOP). Previous studies comparing the two agents have shown inconsistent results and have mostly used intravenous preparations. Objective To assess the effectiveness of oral administration of caffeine compared to oral theophylline as therapy for apnea of prematurity. Methods Fifty consecutively recruited premature neonates (gestational age 28-34 weeks, birth weight <2,500 g) with AOP who were able to tolerate at least 10 mL/kg of enteral feeding were randomized to receive either oral caffeine or oral theophylline for seven days. The main outcome was the daily frequency of apnea after treatment. Secondary outcomes were duration of oxygen or CPAP administration, duration of oxygen fraction (FiO2) taper to reach 21%, time to achievement of full feeding tolerance, length of hospital stay, and side effects. Results We randomized 25 subjects into each group. The distribution of baseline characteristics (gender, gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight and length, age at onset of AOP, and initial frequency of AOP) was similar between both groups. The mean daily number of apnea episodes after treatment was significantly higher in the caffeine group compared to the theophylline group [3.16 (SD 1.31) vs. 2.28 (SD 1.40); P=0.031]. The caffeine group, compared to the theophylline group, also had a longer mean duration of oxygen or CPAP use [12.56 (SD 7.67) days vs. 8.40 (SD 6.41) days; P=0.030] and duration of FiO2 taper [5.76 (SD 2.68) vs. 4.08 (SD 2.54); P=0.035]. There were no significant differences in mean time to full feeding and mean length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of side effects between the two groups. Conclusion In premature neonates with AOP, oral theophylline is slightly more effective than oral caffeine in reducing the frequency of apnea and is associated with a shorter duration of oxygen or CPAP use and duration to reach 21% FiO2.

Paediatrica IndonesianaVol. 64(4)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of oral caffeine and oral theophylline for apnea of prematurity: A randomized clinical trial — Adhie Nur Radityo Suswihardhyono, Gatot Irawan Sarosa, et al. · Paediatrica Indonesiana (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS