Is WR 104 a face-on, colliding-wind binary?

ABSTRACT Two decades of extensive spectroscopic monitoring of WR 104 is used to confront what we think we understand about this iconic prototype of the dust-producing pinwheel stars. Convincing SB1 orbital solutions are obtained for both the WC9d star and its OB companion. The period ($241.54 \pm 0.14$ d) and circular orbit agree perfectly with results from modelling images of the rotating dust spiral. Contrary to those results though, the orbit is found to be significantly inclined instead of face-on. The two SB1 solutions each indicate $i \sim 45^{\circ }$ but could be as low as $\sim 34^{\circ }$. This result naturally provides an explanation for the long puzzling photometric and emission line strength variations but is difficult to reconcile with the imaging. Confirmation that colliding winds are present is found by the detection of variable excess emission in two of the lines where it would be most expected. The changing shapes of this excess emission are not perfectly phase-locked though, which will complicate future modelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2183
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is WR 104 a face-on, colliding-wind binary?

Grant M. Hill
2 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
0.66
article

Is WR 104 a face-on, colliding-wind binary?

Grant M. Hill
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two decades of extensive spectroscopic monitoring of WR 104 is used to confront what we think we understand about this iconic prototype of the dust-producing pinwheel stars. Convincing SB1 orbital solutions are obtained for both the WC9d star and its OB companion. The period ($241.54 \pm 0.14$ d) and circular orbit agree perfectly with results from modelling images of the rotating dust spiral. Contrary to those results though, the orbit is found to be significantly inclined instead of face-on. The two SB1 solutions each indicate $i \sim 45^{\circ }$ but could be as low as $\sim 34^{\circ }$. This result naturally provides an explanation for the long puzzling photometric and emission line strength variations but is difficult to reconcile with the imaging. Confirmation that colliding winds are present is found by the detection of variable excess emission in two of the lines where it would be most expected. The changing shapes of this excess emission are not perfectly phase-locked though, which will complicate future modelling.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 534(3)
W.M. Keck Observatory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is WR 104 a face-on, colliding-wind binary? — Grant M. Hill · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS