Generalization of CNNs on Relational Reasoning With Bar Charts

This article presents a systematic study of the generalization of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and humans on relational reasoning tasks with bar charts. We first revisit previous experiments on graphical perception and update the benchmark performance of CNNs. We then test the generalization performance of CNNs on a classic relational reasoning task: estimating bar length ratios in a bar chart, by progressively perturbing the standard visualizations. We further conduct a user study to compare the performance of CNNs and humans. Our results show that CNNs outperform humans only when the training and test data have the same visual encodings. Otherwise, they may perform worse. We also find that CNNs are sensitive to perturbations in various visual encodings, regardless of their relevance to the target bars. Yet, humans are mainly influenced by bar lengths. Our study suggests that robust relational reasoning with visualizations is challenging for CNNs. Improving CNNs' generalization performance may require training them to better recognize task-related visual properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2024.3463800
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalization of CNNs on Relational Reasoning With Bar Charts

Zhenxing Cui, Hanspeter Pfister, Daniel Haehn, Yunhai Wang et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
1.04
article

Generalization of CNNs on Relational Reasoning With Bar Charts

Zhenxing Cui, Hanspeter Pfister, Daniel Haehn, Yunhai Wang, Yong Wang, Lu Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article presents a systematic study of the generalization of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and humans on relational reasoning tasks with bar charts. We first revisit previous experiments on graphical perception and update the benchmark performance of CNNs. We then test the generalization performance of CNNs on a classic relational reasoning task: estimating bar length ratios in a bar chart, by progressively perturbing the standard visualizations. We further conduct a user study to compare the performance of CNNs and humans. Our results show that CNNs outperform humans only when the training and test data have the same visual encodings. Otherwise, they may perform worse. We also find that CNNs are sensitive to perturbations in various visual encodings, regardless of their relevance to the target bars. Yet, humans are mainly influenced by bar lengths. Our study suggests that robust relational reasoning with visualizations is challenging for CNNs. Improving CNNs' generalization performance may require training them to better recognize task-related visual properties.

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsVol. 31(9)
Harvard University (US), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Zhejiang University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generalization of CNNs on Relational Reasoning With Bar Charts — Zhenxing Cui, Hanspeter Pfister, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS