Hands Collaboration Evaluation for Surgical Skills Assessment: An Information Theoretical Approach

Bimanual tasks, where the brain must simultaneously control and plan the movements of both hands, such as needle passing and tissue cutting, commonly exist in surgeries, e.g., robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. In this study, we present a novel approach for quantifying the quality of hands coordination and correspondence in bimanual tasks by utilizing information theory concepts to build a mathematical framework for measuring the collaboration strength between the two hands. The introduced method makes no assumption about the dynamics and couplings within the robotic platform, executive task, or human motor control. We implemented the proposed approach on MEELS and JIGSAWS datasets, corresponding to conventional minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and robot-assisted MIS, respectively. We analyzed the advantages of hands collaboration features in the skills assessment and style recognition of robotic surgery tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrated that incorporating intuitive domain knowledge of bimanual tasks potentially paves the way for other complex applications, including, but not limited to, autonomous surgery with a high level of model explainability and interpretability. Finally, we presented preliminary results to argue that incorporating hands collaboration features in deep learning-based classifiers reduces uncertainty, improves accuracy, and enhances the out-of-distribution robustness of the final model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmrb.2024.3464110
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hands Collaboration Evaluation for Surgical Skills Assessment: An Information Theoretical Approach

Hossein Rouhani, Mahdi Tavakoli, Yafei Ou, Farzad Aghazadeh et al.
8 citations
IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
Innovations in Medical Education
4.34
article

Hands Collaboration Evaluation for Surgical Skills Assessment: An Information Theoretical Approach

Hossein Rouhani, Mahdi Tavakoli, Yafei Ou, Farzad Aghazadeh, Abed Soleymani, Bin Zheng, Xingyu Li
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Bimanual tasks, where the brain must simultaneously control and plan the movements of both hands, such as needle passing and tissue cutting, commonly exist in surgeries, e.g., robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. In this study, we present a novel approach for quantifying the quality of hands coordination and correspondence in bimanual tasks by utilizing information theory concepts to build a mathematical framework for measuring the collaboration strength between the two hands. The introduced method makes no assumption about the dynamics and couplings within the robotic platform, executive task, or human motor control. We implemented the proposed approach on MEELS and JIGSAWS datasets, corresponding to conventional minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and robot-assisted MIS, respectively. We analyzed the advantages of hands collaboration features in the skills assessment and style recognition of robotic surgery tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrated that incorporating intuitive domain knowledge of bimanual tasks potentially paves the way for other complex applications, including, but not limited to, autonomous surgery with a high level of model explainability and interpretability. Finally, we presented preliminary results to argue that incorporating hands collaboration features in deep learning-based classifiers reduces uncertainty, improves accuracy, and enhances the out-of-distribution robustness of the final model.

IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and BionicsVol. 6(4)
University of Alberta (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovations in Medical Education
4.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.