Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate <i>Loxodes magnus</i>

Most eukaryotes have one nucleus and nuclear genome per cell. Ciliates have instead evolved distinct nuclei that coexist in each cell: a silent germline vs. transcriptionally active somatic nuclei. In the best-studied model species, both nuclei can divide asexually, but only germline nuclei undergo meiosis and karyogamy during sex. Thereafter, thousands of DNA segments, called internally eliminated sequences (IESs), are excised from copies of the germline genomes to produce the streamlined somatic genome. In <i>Loxodes</i>, however, somatic nuclei cannot divide but instead develop from germline copies even during asexual cell division, which would incur a huge overhead cost if genome editing was required. Here, we purified and sequenced both genomes in <i>Loxodes magnus</i> to see whether their nondividing somatic nuclei are associated with differences in genome architecture. Unlike in other ciliates studied to date, we did not find canonical germline-limited IESs, implying <i>Loxodes</i> does not extensively edit its genomes. Instead, both genomes appear large and equivalent, replete with retrotransposons and repetitive sequences, unlike the compact, gene-rich somatic genomes of other ciliates. Two other hallmarks of nuclear development in ciliates-domesticated DDE-family transposases and editing-associated small RNAs-were also not found. Thus, among the ciliates, <i>Loxodes</i> genomes most resemble those of conventional eukaryotes. Nonetheless, base modifications, histone marks, and nucleosome positioning of vegetative <i>Loxodes</i> nuclei are consistent with functional differentiation between actively transcribed somatic vs. inactive germline nuclei. Given their phylogenetic position, it is likely that editing was present in the ancestral ciliate but secondarily lost in the <i>Loxodes</i> lineage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400503121
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Protist diversity and phylogeny
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate Loxodes magnus

Aditi Singh, Volker Soltys, David Emanuel Vetter, Estienne C. Swart et al.
5 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Protist diversity and phylogeny
1.17
article

Nuclear dualism without extensive DNA elimination in the ciliate Loxodes magnus

Aditi Singh, Volker Soltys, David Emanuel Vetter, Estienne C. Swart, Bruno Hüettel, Brandon Kwee Boon Seah, Moritz Peters, Christiane Emmerich
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Most eukaryotes have one nucleus and nuclear genome per cell. Ciliates have instead evolved distinct nuclei that coexist in each cell: a silent germline vs. transcriptionally active somatic nuclei. In the best-studied model species, both nuclei can divide asexually, but only germline nuclei undergo meiosis and karyogamy during sex. Thereafter, thousands of DNA segments, called internally eliminated sequences (IESs), are excised from copies of the germline genomes to produce the streamlined somatic genome. In <i>Loxodes</i>, however, somatic nuclei cannot divide but instead develop from germline copies even during asexual cell division, which would incur a huge overhead cost if genome editing was required. Here, we purified and sequenced both genomes in <i>Loxodes magnus</i> to see whether their nondividing somatic nuclei are associated with differences in genome architecture. Unlike in other ciliates studied to date, we did not find canonical germline-limited IESs, implying <i>Loxodes</i> does not extensively edit its genomes. Instead, both genomes appear large and equivalent, replete with retrotransposons and repetitive sequences, unlike the compact, gene-rich somatic genomes of other ciliates. Two other hallmarks of nuclear development in ciliates-domesticated DDE-family transposases and editing-associated small RNAs-were also not found. Thus, among the ciliates, <i>Loxodes</i> genomes most resemble those of conventional eukaryotes. Nonetheless, base modifications, histone marks, and nucleosome positioning of vegetative <i>Loxodes</i> nuclei are consistent with functional differentiation between actively transcribed somatic vs. inactive germline nuclei. Given their phylogenetic position, it is likely that editing was present in the ancestral ciliate but secondarily lost in the <i>Loxodes</i> lineage.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(39)
Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research (DE), Friedrich Miescher Laboratory (DE), Max Planck Institute for Biology (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Thünen-Institut
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Protist diversity and phylogeny
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.