Strategic naturalizing in the Anthropocene: Managing cells, bodies and ecosystems

Discussions on the Anthropocene have called for increased attention to how the effects of human actions on the planet are accounted for. While much of this debate remains at a theoretical level, more studies on situated Anthropocene realities have been called for. Contributing to the latter, this article explores how experimental and clinical interventions are being accounted for in life science laboratories. Drawing on three research cases, genetically modified mosquitoes, laboratory-grown stem cell lines and assisted reproduction in the IVF clinic, the article traces how ‘strategic naturalizing’ is conducted to make sense of and justify human interventions on cells, bodies and ecosystems. Strategic naturalizing in laboratory work is situated, fluid, and also implicates the presence of the social scientist. Although naturalizing biotechnologies is not a new phenomenon, according to our observations scientists increasingly draw on notions of a planet profoundly transformed by human intervention as they conceptualize their own accountability. Consequently, we propose that strategic naturalizing is emerging as an elemental logic in the patchy local enactments of the Anthropocene and its concerns. In the context of experimental and clinical laboratory work, it is a key element in enacting good science and orienting the work towards making biotechnology acceptable in wider society. In studying this, the social scientist also is implicated in situated local enactments of the Anthropocene.