Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen supply solutions for industrial site

In Austria, one of the highest priorities of hydrogen usage lies in the industrial sector, particularly as a feedstock and for high-temperature applications. Connecting hydrogen producers with consumers is challenging and requires comprehensive research to outline the advantages and challenges associated with various hydrogen supply options. This study focuses on techno-economic assessment of different supply solutions for industrial sites, mainly depicted in two categories: providing hydrogen by transport means and via on-site production. The technologies needed for the investigation of these scenarios are identified based on the predictions of available technologies in near future (2030). The transportation options analyzed include delivering liquid hydrogen by truck, liquid hydrogen by railway and gaseous hydrogen via pipeline. For on-site low-carbon hydrogen production, a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis was selected, as resent research suggests lower costs for PEM electrolysis compared to alkaline electrolysis (AEL). The frequency of deliveries and storage options vary by scenario and are determined by the industrial demand profile, transport capacity and electrolyser production capacity. The assessment evaluates the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of each option, considering factors such as infrastructure requirements, energy efficiency and economic viability. At a hydrogen demand of 80 GWh, the transport options indicate hydrogen supply costs in the range of 14–24 ct/kWh. In contrast, the scenarios investigating on-site production of hydrogen show costs between 29 and 49 ct/kWh. Therefore, transport by truck, rail or pipeline is economically advantageous to own-production under the specific assumptions and conditions. However, the results indicate that as energy demand increases, on-site production becomes more attractive. Additionally, the influence of electricity prices and the hydrogen production/import price were identified as decisive factors for the overall hydrogen supply costs. • Supply options of hydrogen to industrial site strongly depend on the yearly hydrogen demand. • Pipeline transport proves economically beneficial due to the absence of storage and conversion costs. • On-site hydrogen production with storage provides production flexibility and cost benefits under certain circumstances. • Sensitivity analysis shows that hydrogen import prices and electricity prices are key factors for hydrogen supply costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.099
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen supply solutions for industrial site

Roberta Cvetkovska, Thomas Kienberger, Lukas Wechner
13 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
2.20
article

Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen supply solutions for industrial site

Roberta Cvetkovska, Thomas Kienberger, Lukas Wechner
article en
13 citations

Abstract

In Austria, one of the highest priorities of hydrogen usage lies in the industrial sector, particularly as a feedstock and for high-temperature applications. Connecting hydrogen producers with consumers is challenging and requires comprehensive research to outline the advantages and challenges associated with various hydrogen supply options. This study focuses on techno-economic assessment of different supply solutions for industrial sites, mainly depicted in two categories: providing hydrogen by transport means and via on-site production. The technologies needed for the investigation of these scenarios are identified based on the predictions of available technologies in near future (2030). The transportation options analyzed include delivering liquid hydrogen by truck, liquid hydrogen by railway and gaseous hydrogen via pipeline. For on-site low-carbon hydrogen production, a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis was selected, as resent research suggests lower costs for PEM electrolysis compared to alkaline electrolysis (AEL). The frequency of deliveries and storage options vary by scenario and are determined by the industrial demand profile, transport capacity and electrolyser production capacity. The assessment evaluates the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of each option, considering factors such as infrastructure requirements, energy efficiency and economic viability. At a hydrogen demand of 80 GWh, the transport options indicate hydrogen supply costs in the range of 14–24 ct/kWh. In contrast, the scenarios investigating on-site production of hydrogen show costs between 29 and 49 ct/kWh. Therefore, transport by truck, rail or pipeline is economically advantageous to own-production under the specific assumptions and conditions. However, the results indicate that as energy demand increases, on-site production becomes more attractive. Additionally, the influence of electricity prices and the hydrogen production/import price were identified as decisive factors for the overall hydrogen supply costs. • Supply options of hydrogen to industrial site strongly depend on the yearly hydrogen demand. • Pipeline transport proves economically beneficial due to the absence of storage and conversion costs. • On-site hydrogen production with storage provides production flexibility and cost benefits under certain circumstances. • Sensitivity analysis shows that hydrogen import prices and electricity prices are key factors for hydrogen supply costs.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 104
Montanuniversität Leoben (AT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
2.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.