Energy-saving cooling strategies in tunnel-ventilated dairy buildings: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and validation

• Energy-efficient cooling strategies were investigated for a dairy barn. • A total of 252 detailed cow models were placed inside a tunnel-ventilated building. • Floor and tube cooling were simulated using ground-source heat pumps as a reference. • CFD simulations demonstrated significantly lower temperatures with tube cooling. • Additionally, tube cooling resulted in 47.5–62.5 % less electricity consumption. Ventilation is a key strategy for addressing heat stress in dairy cattle. In this study, we developed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for a 252-head free stall tunnel-ventilated dairy building equipped with ridge openings and circulation fans. A detailed cow model was developed for a standard 625 kg Holstein cattle. Both tube and floor cooling were developed as supplemental cooling strategies using a ground source heat pump while the ventilation fans continued to operate at a reduced air speed (30 to 65 % reduction). The average air velocity within the stalls for the control (1.4 ± 0.32 m s -1 ) was significantly higher than the average velocity achieved with floor cooling (1.02±0.41 m s -1 ) and tube cooling (0.69±0.21 m s -1 ) ( p = 0.043). Despite lower air velocities, CFD simulations showed that the average temperature at cow resting height for tube cooling (27.9 ± 0.21 °C) was significantly lower than that for the control (28.6 ± 0.36 °C) and floor cooling (28.3 ± 0.14 °C) ( p = 0.021). For 252 cows, the total electricity consumption for the control was 40,590 kWh during summer, while for floor cooling, it varied between 30,683 and 36,181 kWh, and for tube cooling, it ranged from 15,879 to 21,378 kWh. Ventilation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the tunnel-ventilated barn were 0.12 t of CO 2 eq. per cow. Future studies could investigate the impact of reduced airflow rates on air quality inside the buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100576
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy-saving cooling strategies in tunnel-ventilated dairy buildings: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and validation

Li Jiang, Neslihan Akdeniz, Yoonhong Yi
6 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
2.05
article

Energy-saving cooling strategies in tunnel-ventilated dairy buildings: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and validation

Li Jiang, Neslihan Akdeniz, Yoonhong Yi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Energy-efficient cooling strategies were investigated for a dairy barn. • A total of 252 detailed cow models were placed inside a tunnel-ventilated building. • Floor and tube cooling were simulated using ground-source heat pumps as a reference. • CFD simulations demonstrated significantly lower temperatures with tube cooling. • Additionally, tube cooling resulted in 47.5–62.5 % less electricity consumption. Ventilation is a key strategy for addressing heat stress in dairy cattle. In this study, we developed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for a 252-head free stall tunnel-ventilated dairy building equipped with ridge openings and circulation fans. A detailed cow model was developed for a standard 625 kg Holstein cattle. Both tube and floor cooling were developed as supplemental cooling strategies using a ground source heat pump while the ventilation fans continued to operate at a reduced air speed (30 to 65 % reduction). The average air velocity within the stalls for the control (1.4 ± 0.32 m s -1 ) was significantly higher than the average velocity achieved with floor cooling (1.02±0.41 m s -1 ) and tube cooling (0.69±0.21 m s -1 ) ( p = 0.043). Despite lower air velocities, CFD simulations showed that the average temperature at cow resting height for tube cooling (27.9 ± 0.21 °C) was significantly lower than that for the control (28.6 ± 0.36 °C) and floor cooling (28.3 ± 0.14 °C) ( p = 0.021). For 252 cows, the total electricity consumption for the control was 40,590 kWh during summer, while for floor cooling, it varied between 30,683 and 36,181 kWh, and for tube cooling, it ranged from 15,879 to 21,378 kWh. Ventilation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the tunnel-ventilated barn were 0.12 t of CO 2 eq. per cow. Future studies could investigate the impact of reduced airflow rates on air quality inside the buildings.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 9
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Illinois Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.