People judge others more harshly after talking to bots

People now commonly interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents. How do these interactions shape how humans perceive each other? In two preregistered studies (total <i>N</i> = 1,261), we show that people evaluate other humans more harshly after interacting with an AI (compared with an unrelated purported human). In Study 1, participants who worked on a creative task with AIs (versus purported humans) subsequently rated another purported human's work more negatively. Study 2 replicated this effect and demonstrated that the results hold even when participants believed their evaluation would not be shared with the purported human. Exploratory analyses of participants' conversations show that prior to their human evaluations they were more demanding, more instrumental and displayed less positive affect towards AIs (versus purported humans). These findings point to a potentially worrisome side effect of the exponential rise in human-AI interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae397
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

People judge others more harshly after talking to bots

Asaf Mazar, Geoff Tomaino, Angela Duckworth, Lyle Ungar et al.
6 citations
PNAS Nexus
Misinformation and Its Impacts
6.79
article

People judge others more harshly after talking to bots

Asaf Mazar, Geoff Tomaino, Angela Duckworth, Lyle Ungar, Kian Siong Tey
article en
6 citations

Abstract

People now commonly interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents. How do these interactions shape how humans perceive each other? In two preregistered studies (total <i>N</i> = 1,261), we show that people evaluate other humans more harshly after interacting with an AI (compared with an unrelated purported human). In Study 1, participants who worked on a creative task with AIs (versus purported humans) subsequently rated another purported human's work more negatively. Study 2 replicated this effect and demonstrated that the results hold even when participants believed their evaluation would not be shared with the purported human. Exploratory analyses of participants' conversations show that prior to their human evaluations they were more demanding, more instrumental and displayed less positive affect towards AIs (versus purported humans). These findings point to a potentially worrisome side effect of the exponential rise in human-AI interactions.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(9)
University of Florida (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

People judge others more harshly after talking to bots — Asaf Mazar, Geoff Tomaino, et al. · PNAS Nexus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS