A study on calibration methods of noise annoyance data from listening tests

In listening tests of noise annoyance, subjects act as "measuring instruments". Noise annoyance of different subjects induced by a same noise sample, or noise annoyance of a same subject induced by a same noise sample in different experimental groups, are different due to the varying psychological scale of subjects. To unify subjects' psychological scale and accurately determine perceived annoyance, it is necessary to investigate the optimal noise annoyance data calibration method. Based on the master scale transformation, three kinds of annoyance data calibration methods, i.e., individual annoyance data calibration, sound sample annoyance data calibration, and a combination of both methods, were explored. The effectiveness of three methods for unifying subjects' psychological scale was ascertained. Results showed that the individual annoyance data calibration was the most effective among the three calibration methods. After calibration, the difference between annoyance induced by a same sound sample in any two different experimental sound sample groups declined significantly. The determination coefficient of the fitting curve between psychoacoustic annoyance and perceived annoyance, R2, upgraded significantly. By comprehensively applying listening test methods and annoyance data calibration methods suggested in this study, the psychological scale of the subjects can be as unified as possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0028611
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on calibration methods of noise annoyance data from listening tests

Yuhua Chen, Guoqing Di, Zhengguang Li, Hanxin Li
1 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
0.87
article

A study on calibration methods of noise annoyance data from listening tests

Yuhua Chen, Guoqing Di, Zhengguang Li, Hanxin Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In listening tests of noise annoyance, subjects act as "measuring instruments". Noise annoyance of different subjects induced by a same noise sample, or noise annoyance of a same subject induced by a same noise sample in different experimental groups, are different due to the varying psychological scale of subjects. To unify subjects' psychological scale and accurately determine perceived annoyance, it is necessary to investigate the optimal noise annoyance data calibration method. Based on the master scale transformation, three kinds of annoyance data calibration methods, i.e., individual annoyance data calibration, sound sample annoyance data calibration, and a combination of both methods, were explored. The effectiveness of three methods for unifying subjects' psychological scale was ascertained. Results showed that the individual annoyance data calibration was the most effective among the three calibration methods. After calibration, the difference between annoyance induced by a same sound sample in any two different experimental sound sample groups declined significantly. The determination coefficient of the fitting curve between psychoacoustic annoyance and perceived annoyance, R2, upgraded significantly. By comprehensively applying listening test methods and annoyance data calibration methods suggested in this study, the psychological scale of the subjects can be as unified as possible.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 156(3)
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Yangtze University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Noise Effects and Management
0.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.