Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on aesthetics and reconstructive breast surgery: A meta‐research
Methodological and reposting quality of SR of randomized clinical trials on esthetic or reconstructive breast surgery is poor. Half of the authors referred to the use of valid guidance to plan and conduct their reviews and none of them referred the use of a guidance for reporting their results.
Authors
- Rafael Leite Pacheco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-8471)
- Pedro Henrique de Mattos Cavalcante (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6783-382X)
- Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9146-4684)
- Alex Sandro Moreira Fragoso de Oliveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9525-7339)
- Rachel Riera (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9522-1871)
Institutions
- Centro Universitário São Camilo (BR)
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2024-09-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14141
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.54