Population-Level Administrative Data: A Resource to Advance Psychological Science

Population-level administrative data-data on individuals' interactions with administrative systems, such as healthcare, social-welfare, criminal-justice, and education systems-are a fruitful resource for research into behavior, development, and wellbeing. However, administrative data are underutilized in psychological science. Here, we review advantages of population-level administrative data for psychological research, with examples of advances in psychological theory arising from administrative-data studies. We focus on advantages in three areas: (1) How population-level administrative data are collected and recorded, (2) the data's large scale, and (3) unique data-linkages. We also describe ethical issues as well as methodological considerations and limitations in population administrative-data research, and future directions to enable psychological scientists to more fully capitalize on administrative-data resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241275570
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population-Level Administrative Data: A Resource to Advance Psychological Science

Leah S. Richmond‐Rakerd, Signe Hald Andersen, Stephanie D’Souza, Kallisse R. Dent et al.
1 citations
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Health disparities and outcomes
0.53
article

Population-Level Administrative Data: A Resource to Advance Psychological Science

Leah S. Richmond‐Rakerd, Signe Hald Andersen, Stephanie D’Souza, Kallisse R. Dent, Barry John Milne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Population-level administrative data-data on individuals' interactions with administrative systems, such as healthcare, social-welfare, criminal-justice, and education systems-are a fruitful resource for research into behavior, development, and wellbeing. However, administrative data are underutilized in psychological science. Here, we review advantages of population-level administrative data for psychological research, with examples of advances in psychological theory arising from administrative-data studies. We focus on advantages in three areas: (1) How population-level administrative data are collected and recorded, (2) the data's large scale, and (3) unique data-linkages. We also describe ethical issues as well as methodological considerations and limitations in population administrative-data research, and future directions to enable psychological scientists to more fully capitalize on administrative-data resources.

Current Directions in Psychological ScienceVol. 33(6)
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Michigan (US), Rockwool Foundation (DK)
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Rockwool Fonden, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Health disparities and outcomes
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Population-Level Administrative Data: A Resource to Advance Psychological Science — Leah S. Richmond‐Rakerd, Signe Hald Andersen, et al. · Current Directions in Psychological Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS