Exploring Organization of the National Curriculum for Development of Thinking Competency

Objectives The purpose of this study is to identify problems by reviewing the contents of the 2022 revised curriculum general guidelines and subject curriculum on student thinking, and to explore organization of the National curriculum to develop students’ thinking competency. Methods By exploring the definitions and characteristics of the ability of creative thinking and problem-solving, which are higher-order thinking processes, to establish the foundation for understanding and improving creative thinking competency and knowledge information processing competency, and identified problems by analyzing the content dealing with students’ thinking in general guidelines and subject curriculum. Additionally, the definitions and characteristics of thinking competency in the curriculum documents of Australia and British Columbia, Canada, were examined, and the thinking competency presented in the subject curriculum was analyzed. Results In the general guidelines, the definition and elements of creative thinking competency and knowledge information processing competency are not clear, and the thinking process and the relationship between higher-order thinking processes are not considered. In addition, in the subject curriculum, it fails to demonstrate how procedural knowledge can lead to the development of higher-order thinking processes or competencies. In contrast, Australian and British Columbia have established thinking competencies and elements based on research on higher-order thinking processes, presented the development levels of thinking competencies, and provided subject curriculum contents that reflected the elements of thinking competencies. Conclusions Thinking competency needs to be established considering the relationship between higher-order thinking processes, and the elements and sub-elements of thinking competency must reflect the thinking process, not just the characteristics of thinking, so that they can be specified and applied to teaching, learning, and assessment. And, presenting the development of thinking competency can be used to deepen knowledge and skills in the curriculum content system and confirm the performance of students' competency in assessment.

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.17.687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Organization of the National Curriculum for Development of Thinking Competency

1 citations
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Educational Research and Pedagogy
0.35
article

Exploring Organization of the National Curriculum for Development of Thinking Competency

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to identify problems by reviewing the contents of the 2022 revised curriculum general guidelines and subject curriculum on student thinking, and to explore organization of the National curriculum to develop students’ thinking competency. Methods By exploring the definitions and characteristics of the ability of creative thinking and problem-solving, which are higher-order thinking processes, to establish the foundation for understanding and improving creative thinking competency and knowledge information processing competency, and identified problems by analyzing the content dealing with students’ thinking in general guidelines and subject curriculum. Additionally, the definitions and characteristics of thinking competency in the curriculum documents of Australia and British Columbia, Canada, were examined, and the thinking competency presented in the subject curriculum was analyzed. Results In the general guidelines, the definition and elements of creative thinking competency and knowledge information processing competency are not clear, and the thinking process and the relationship between higher-order thinking processes are not considered. In addition, in the subject curriculum, it fails to demonstrate how procedural knowledge can lead to the development of higher-order thinking processes or competencies. In contrast, Australian and British Columbia have established thinking competencies and elements based on research on higher-order thinking processes, presented the development levels of thinking competencies, and provided subject curriculum contents that reflected the elements of thinking competencies. Conclusions Thinking competency needs to be established considering the relationship between higher-order thinking processes, and the elements and sub-elements of thinking competency must reflect the thinking process, not just the characteristics of thinking, so that they can be specified and applied to teaching, learning, and assessment. And, presenting the development of thinking competency can be used to deepen knowledge and skills in the curriculum content system and confirm the performance of students' competency in assessment.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 24(17)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.