Estimating ungulate migration corridors from sparse movement data

Abstract Many ungulates migrate between distinct summer and winter ranges, and identifying, mapping, and conserving these migration corridors have become a focus of local, regional, and global conservation efforts. Brownian bridge movement models (BBMMs) are commonly used to empirically identify these seasonal migration corridors; however, they require location data sampled at relatively frequent intervals to obtain a robust estimate of an animal's movement path. Fitting BBMMs to sparse location data violates the assumption of conditional random movement between successive locations, overestimating the area (and width) of a migration corridor when creating individual and population‐level occurrence distributions and precluding the use of low‐frequency, or sparse, data in mapping migration corridors. In an effort to expand the utility of BBMMs to include sparse GPS data, we propose an alternative approach to model migration corridors from sparse GPS data. We demonstrate this method using GPS data collected every 2 h from four mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) and four elk ( Cervus canadensis ) herds within Wyoming and Idaho. First, we used BBMMs to estimate a baseline corridor for the 2‐h data. We then subsampled the 2‐h data to one location every 12 h (a proxy for sparse data) and fitted BBMMs to the 12‐h data using a fixed motion variance (FMV) value, instead of estimating the Brownian motion variance empirically. A range of FMV values was tested to identify the value that best approximated the baseline migration corridor. FMV values within a species‐specific range (mule deer: 400–1200 m 2 ; elk: 600–1600 m 2 ) successfully delineated migration corridors similar to the 2‐h baseline corridors; overall, lower values delineated narrower corridors and higher values delineated wider corridors. Optimal FMV values of 800 m 2 (mule deer) and 1000 m 2 (elk) decreased the inflation of the 12‐h corridors relative to the 2‐h corridors from traditional BBMMs. This FMV approach thus enables using sparse movement data to approximate realistic migration corridor dimensions, providing an important alternative when movement data are collected infrequently. This approach greatly expands the number of datasets that can be used for migration corridor mapping—a useful tool for management and conservation across the globe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4983
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating ungulate migration corridors from sparse movement data

Hall Sawyer, J. van den Berg, Ellen O. Aikens, Blake Lowrey et al.
4 citations
Ecosphere
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.84
article

Estimating ungulate migration corridors from sparse movement data

Hall Sawyer, J. van den Berg, Ellen O. Aikens, Blake Lowrey, Scott Bergen, Eric K. Cole, Holly E. Copeland, Mark A. Hurley, Matthew J. Kauffman, Jennifer L. McKee, Alyson B. Courtemanch, Julien Fattebert, Jerod A. Merkle, Arthur D. Middleton, Tristan A. Nuñez, Sarah R. Dewey
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Many ungulates migrate between distinct summer and winter ranges, and identifying, mapping, and conserving these migration corridors have become a focus of local, regional, and global conservation efforts. Brownian bridge movement models (BBMMs) are commonly used to empirically identify these seasonal migration corridors; however, they require location data sampled at relatively frequent intervals to obtain a robust estimate of an animal's movement path. Fitting BBMMs to sparse location data violates the assumption of conditional random movement between successive locations, overestimating the area (and width) of a migration corridor when creating individual and population‐level occurrence distributions and precluding the use of low‐frequency, or sparse, data in mapping migration corridors. In an effort to expand the utility of BBMMs to include sparse GPS data, we propose an alternative approach to model migration corridors from sparse GPS data. We demonstrate this method using GPS data collected every 2 h from four mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) and four elk ( Cervus canadensis ) herds within Wyoming and Idaho. First, we used BBMMs to estimate a baseline corridor for the 2‐h data. We then subsampled the 2‐h data to one location every 12 h (a proxy for sparse data) and fitted BBMMs to the 12‐h data using a fixed motion variance (FMV) value, instead of estimating the Brownian motion variance empirically. A range of FMV values was tested to identify the value that best approximated the baseline migration corridor. FMV values within a species‐specific range (mule deer: 400–1200 m 2 ; elk: 600–1600 m 2 ) successfully delineated migration corridors similar to the 2‐h baseline corridors; overall, lower values delineated narrower corridors and higher values delineated wider corridors. Optimal FMV values of 800 m 2 (mule deer) and 1000 m 2 (elk) decreased the inflation of the 12‐h corridors relative to the 2‐h corridors from traditional BBMMs. This FMV approach thus enables using sparse movement data to approximate realistic migration corridor dimensions, providing an important alternative when movement data are collected infrequently. This approach greatly expands the number of datasets that can be used for migration corridor mapping—a useful tool for management and conservation across the globe.

EcosphereVol. 15(9)
University of Wyoming (US), United States Geological Survey (US), National Park Service (US), Idaho Department of Fish and Game (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Western EcoSystems Technology (United States) (US), Wyoming Game and Fish Department (US), Grand Teton National Park, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, University of Maine (US), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Knobloch Family Foundation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.