Clinical effects of accreditation in general practice: a pragmatic randomized controlled study

In this first randomized study exploring the effects of accreditation in a primary care context, accreditation was found to reduce the number of redeemed medications and polypharmacy. We conclude that accreditation can be effective in changing behaviour, but the identified effects are small and limited to certain outcomes. Evaluations on the cost-effectiveness of accreditation are therefore warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Practice
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical effects of accreditation in general practice: a pragmatic randomized controlled study

Susanne Reventlow, Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard Andersen, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Frans Boch Waldorff et al.
1 citations
Family Practice
Healthcare Quality and Management
0.71
article

Clinical effects of accreditation in general practice: a pragmatic randomized controlled study

Susanne Reventlow, Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard Andersen, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Frans Boch Waldorff, Volkert Siersma, Jens Søndergaard, Line Bjørnskov Pedersen, Flemming Bro, Sonja Wehberg, T. D. Due
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this first randomized study exploring the effects of accreditation in a primary care context, accreditation was found to reduce the number of redeemed medications and polypharmacy. We conclude that accreditation can be effective in changing behaviour, but the identified effects are small and limited to certain outcomes. Evaluations on the cost-effectiveness of accreditation are therefore warranted.

Family PracticeVol. 42(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Mental Health Services (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Capital Region of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Healthcare Quality and Management
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.