Assessing border walls’ varied impacts on terrorist group diffusion

Do border walls inhibit the spread of transnational terrorism? Previous research has primarily measured the volume of terrorism without explicitly modeling its diffusion or considering how walls might affect different groups differently. To address these oversights, the study adopts a network-based approach, analyzing the impact of border walls on the spread of violence among 63 extremist organizations from 1970 to 2017. The findings show that barriers generally inhibit diffusion, but their effectiveness varies significantly among groups. This research challenges policymakers who regard walls as a catch-all solution for terrorism, offering a fresh perspective on whether walls’ effects justify their cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942241270927
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing border walls’ varied impacts on terrorist group diffusion

Nazlı Avdan, Andrew S. Rosenberg
2 citations
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
article

Assessing border walls’ varied impacts on terrorist group diffusion

Nazlı Avdan, Andrew S. Rosenberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Do border walls inhibit the spread of transnational terrorism? Previous research has primarily measured the volume of terrorism without explicitly modeling its diffusion or considering how walls might affect different groups differently. To address these oversights, the study adopts a network-based approach, analyzing the impact of border walls on the spread of violence among 63 extremist organizations from 1970 to 2017. The findings show that barriers generally inhibit diffusion, but their effectiveness varies significantly among groups. This research challenges policymakers who regard walls as a catch-all solution for terrorism, offering a fresh perspective on whether walls’ effects justify their cost.

Conflict Management and Peace ScienceVol. 42(4)
University of Kansas (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.