Dosimetric Comparison between the HyperArc and Conventional VMAT in Cervical Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery

<b>Background:</b> This research aims to evaluate the usability of the HyperArc (HA) technique in stereotactic radiosurgery for cervical spine metastasis by comparing the dosimetry of the target and organs at risk, specifically the spinal cord, between HA and VMAT and conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). <b>Methods:</b> A RANDO^® phantom and QFix Encompass^TM and support system were used to simulate three target types (A, B, and C) based on RTOG0631 guidelines. Treatment plans included one VMAT and two HyperArc techniques with different SRS NTO values (100 and 250). Dosimetric parameters such as conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), R₅₀, and spinal cord sparing were analyzed. Gamma analysis was performed using portal dosimetry to validate the dose delivery accuracy. <b>Results:</b> HyperArc plans demonstrated higher conformity, sharper dose fall-off, and improved quality assurance (QA) results compared to VMAT plans. HA with SRS NTO 250 showed even better results in terms of conformity, dose fall-off, and spinal cord dose reduction (V₁₀ and D_max) compared to HA with SRS NTO 100. Although the mean gamma passing rates were slightly lower, all plans achieved rates above 95%. <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings suggest that HA provides superior dosimetric benefits over VMAT and could be effectively utilized for cervical spine radiation therapy.