Gender-affirming surgeries and patient-reported outcomes in gender binary versus non-binary and genderqueer-identifying individuals

Background: Approximately 25%–50% of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals identify as non-binary and/or genderqueer (NBGQ), yet understanding of the role of genital gender-affirming surgeries (GAS) and the overall outcomes of gender-affirming treatment in this group is limited. Aim: Comparing the choice of gender-affirming surgical treatments and patient-reported outcomes between binary and NBGQ TGD individuals. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey including 171 participants who completed at least 80% of their medical transition and had undergone GAS (based on self-report). Participants were grouped as binary transgender (n = 151) or NBGQ (n = 20) based on self-reported gender identity. Main outcomes included the propensity for genital GAS in NBGQ individuals compared to binary peers. Patient-reported outcomes, such as gender congruence, body satisfaction, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and mental health, were compared between groups. Analyses were conducted accounting for potential confounding factors including age, sex assigned at birth, and level of social support. Results: NBGQ individuals reported a lower likelihood of having received genital GAS compared to binary-identifying participants (55.0% vs. 84.1%; OR = 0.23; p =.002), also after correcting for confounding factors, such as sex assigned at birth (OR = 0.28; p =.03; 95% CI 0.09–0.90). Patient-reported outcomes indicated poorer post-treatment body satisfaction and gender recognition, self-esteem, life satisfaction, and mental health in the NBGQ group (small to large effect sizes). Discussion: The study emphasizes the differences in treatment characteristics of NBGQ individuals undergoing gender-affirming surgical care, related to both surgeries received and (poorer) patient-reported outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of individualized and equitable care in TGD healthcare to improve overall health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transgender Health
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2024.2397726
Citations
3
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-affirming surgeries and patient-reported outcomes in gender binary versus non-binary and genderqueer-identifying individuals

Matteo Angelini, Wouter B. van der Sluis, Danny A. Young‐Afat, Margriet G. Mullender et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Transgender Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
1.93
article

Gender-affirming surgeries and patient-reported outcomes in gender binary versus non-binary and genderqueer-identifying individuals

Matteo Angelini, Wouter B. van der Sluis, Danny A. Young‐Afat, Margriet G. Mullender, Mark‐Bram Bouman, Tim C. van de Grift
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background: Approximately 25%–50% of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals identify as non-binary and/or genderqueer (NBGQ), yet understanding of the role of genital gender-affirming surgeries (GAS) and the overall outcomes of gender-affirming treatment in this group is limited. Aim: Comparing the choice of gender-affirming surgical treatments and patient-reported outcomes between binary and NBGQ TGD individuals. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey including 171 participants who completed at least 80% of their medical transition and had undergone GAS (based on self-report). Participants were grouped as binary transgender (n = 151) or NBGQ (n = 20) based on self-reported gender identity. Main outcomes included the propensity for genital GAS in NBGQ individuals compared to binary peers. Patient-reported outcomes, such as gender congruence, body satisfaction, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and mental health, were compared between groups. Analyses were conducted accounting for potential confounding factors including age, sex assigned at birth, and level of social support. Results: NBGQ individuals reported a lower likelihood of having received genital GAS compared to binary-identifying participants (55.0% vs. 84.1%; OR = 0.23; p =.002), also after correcting for confounding factors, such as sex assigned at birth (OR = 0.28; p =.03; 95% CI 0.09–0.90). Patient-reported outcomes indicated poorer post-treatment body satisfaction and gender recognition, self-esteem, life satisfaction, and mental health in the NBGQ group (small to large effect sizes). Discussion: The study emphasizes the differences in treatment characteristics of NBGQ individuals undergoing gender-affirming surgical care, related to both surgeries received and (poorer) patient-reported outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of individualized and equitable care in TGD healthcare to improve overall health outcomes.

International Journal of Transgender HealthVol. 26(2)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Public Health Institute (US), Zaans Medisch Centrum (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.