Diagnostics of the Level of Mental Disorder in Combatants with Acute Stress Disorder on the Stage of Hospital Rehabilitation

<p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate methods for diagnosing the level of mental disorders in combatants with acute stress disorder. The study presents data from an experimental sample of male military combatants with acute stress disorder (N=39) undergoing medical rehabilitation in a military clinical hospital. To assess the level of mental disorders, we used the “Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire” (SASRQ), the “Module-support” (Module-s) questionnaire, and the “Inventory of Neurotic Disorders-Symptomatic” (IND-S). The results showed that the SASRQ provided a reliable assessment of the level of mental disorders, whereas the Module-S and IND-S questionnaires had overlapping indicators across groups, making it difficult to interpret the results unambiguously. It was found that in a military clinical hospital, the largest group of combatants with acute stress disorder (49%) had a neurotic level of mental disorders, classified as temporary psychogenic losses, and required psychotherapeutic help. The second largest group of patients was 36% and had a prenosological level of mental disorders. These patients did not require further evacuation, they required psychological assistance with a subsequent return to duty. Military personnel in the psychogenic losses group (psychotic level) accounted for 15%, these individuals required evacuation to rear medical institutions for specialized psychiatric care.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology and Special Education
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostics of the Level of Mental Disorder in Combatants with Acute Stress Disorder on the Stage of Hospital Rehabilitation

N. V. Zelenina, Irina V. Fedotkina, Vladislav V. Yusupov, E.A. Chernyavskiy
1 citations
Clinical Psychology and Special Education
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
0.64
article

Diagnostics of the Level of Mental Disorder in Combatants with Acute Stress Disorder on the Stage of Hospital Rehabilitation

N. V. Zelenina, Irina V. Fedotkina, Vladislav V. Yusupov, E.A. Chernyavskiy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate methods for diagnosing the level of mental disorders in combatants with acute stress disorder. The study presents data from an experimental sample of male military combatants with acute stress disorder (N=39) undergoing medical rehabilitation in a military clinical hospital. To assess the level of mental disorders, we used the “Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire” (SASRQ), the “Module-support” (Module-s) questionnaire, and the “Inventory of Neurotic Disorders-Symptomatic” (IND-S). The results showed that the SASRQ provided a reliable assessment of the level of mental disorders, whereas the Module-S and IND-S questionnaires had overlapping indicators across groups, making it difficult to interpret the results unambiguously. It was found that in a military clinical hospital, the largest group of combatants with acute stress disorder (49%) had a neurotic level of mental disorders, classified as temporary psychogenic losses, and required psychotherapeutic help. The second largest group of patients was 36% and had a prenosological level of mental disorders. These patients did not require further evacuation, they required psychological assistance with a subsequent return to duty. Military personnel in the psychogenic losses group (psychotic level) accounted for 15%, these individuals required evacuation to rear medical institutions for specialized psychiatric care.</p>

Clinical Psychology and Special EducationVol. 13(2)
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.