P070 ROLE OF NOVEL BLOOD PRESSURE METRICS IN EARLY BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL ASSESSMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE SPRINT TRIAL

Objective: Innovative blood pressure (BP) metrics is pivotal to expedite the BP management among individuals with hypertension. Methods and Findings: This is a post-hoc analysis of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). A total of 8369 participants, who had comprehensive BP records and experienced no adverse events during the initial 90-day follow-up, were included. Two novel BP metrics, systolic blood pressure (SBP) burden and Time-in-Target-Range (TTR), were calculated by employing three-month SBP recordings from follow-up data. SBP Burden were derived as the proportion of area under curve (AUC) over a specific SBP threshold (SBP values >130 mmHg) in a short-term exposure period (from the first month to third month). SBP TTR was estimated by the proportion of time in a specified SBP target range (110 to 140mmHg) in the same exposure period. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), as the primary outcome of this analysis, was a composite endpoint including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, as well as all-cause mortality. The relationship of novel BP metrics and study endpoints was accessed by using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Over a median follow-up period of 3.90 [3.88-3.94] years, 559 MACEs occurred. Both SBP burden (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.126 [1.039-1.221]) and SBP TTR (HR: 0.862[0.783-0.949]) were independently correlated with MACEs according to adjusted Cox models. Evaluation using C-statistic and Net Reclassification Indexes (NRI) revealed that both two novel SBP metrics outperformed mean SBP and SBP standard deviation (SD) in predicting MACEs. Furthermore, the predictive value of SBP burden and TTR was consistent across MACE(P=0.383) and secondary endpoints (all P value > 0.05) in this analysis. Conclusions: Among non-diabetic patients with hypertension, both the cumulative SBP burden and TTR independently predict MACEs, surpassing the predictive power of mean SBP and SBP SD. This study substantiates the application of innovative BP measurements for early-stage assessment of BP control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001063152.75551.65
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P070 ROLE OF NOVEL BLOOD PRESSURE METRICS IN EARLY BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL ASSESSMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE SPRINT TRIAL

Yi Zhang, Yifan Zhao, Moran Li, Jieying Shi
Journal of Hypertension
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

P070 ROLE OF NOVEL BLOOD PRESSURE METRICS IN EARLY BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL ASSESSMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE SPRINT TRIAL

Yi Zhang, Yifan Zhao, Moran Li, Jieying Shi
article en

Abstract

Objective: Innovative blood pressure (BP) metrics is pivotal to expedite the BP management among individuals with hypertension. Methods and Findings: This is a post-hoc analysis of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). A total of 8369 participants, who had comprehensive BP records and experienced no adverse events during the initial 90-day follow-up, were included. Two novel BP metrics, systolic blood pressure (SBP) burden and Time-in-Target-Range (TTR), were calculated by employing three-month SBP recordings from follow-up data. SBP Burden were derived as the proportion of area under curve (AUC) over a specific SBP threshold (SBP values >130 mmHg) in a short-term exposure period (from the first month to third month). SBP TTR was estimated by the proportion of time in a specified SBP target range (110 to 140mmHg) in the same exposure period. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), as the primary outcome of this analysis, was a composite endpoint including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, as well as all-cause mortality. The relationship of novel BP metrics and study endpoints was accessed by using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Over a median follow-up period of 3.90 [3.88-3.94] years, 559 MACEs occurred. Both SBP burden (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.126 [1.039-1.221]) and SBP TTR (HR: 0.862[0.783-0.949]) were independently correlated with MACEs according to adjusted Cox models. Evaluation using C-statistic and Net Reclassification Indexes (NRI) revealed that both two novel SBP metrics outperformed mean SBP and SBP standard deviation (SD) in predicting MACEs. Furthermore, the predictive value of SBP burden and TTR was consistent across MACE(P=0.383) and secondary endpoints (all P value > 0.05) in this analysis. Conclusions: Among non-diabetic patients with hypertension, both the cumulative SBP burden and TTR independently predict MACEs, surpassing the predictive power of mean SBP and SBP SD. This study substantiates the application of innovative BP measurements for early-stage assessment of BP control.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 42(Suppl 3)
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.