O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Background and objective. Uscom BP+ is a cuff-based blood pressure (BP) device designed to non-invasively estimate central BP as distinct from conventional brachial BP. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the Uscom BP+ device compared to invasively measured BP. Methods. Automated non-invasive cuff central BP (using the Uscom BP+ device) and invasive central aortic BP (using fluid-filled catheters) were recorded simultaneously in 191 participants (65% male, aged 66±11 years) receiving coronary angiography at three independent research sites (Hobart, Australia, Perugia, Italy and Wroclaw, Poland). Validation assessment procedures were undertaken according to the Artery Society recommendations and with a minimal acceptable error of ≤5±≤8 mmHg as pass criteria. Results. Using the device default calibration technique (brachial cuff systolic [SBP] and diastolic BP [DBP]), cuff central SBP underestimated invasive central SBP [mean(SD) difference: -10.2(11.2) mmHg] and cuff central DBP overestimated invasive central DBP [mean(SD) difference: 9.7(8.6) mmHg]. When calibrating by cuff mean arterial pressure and DBP in a sub-group (n=140), SBP accuracy was improved, but variability remained high [mean(SD) difference: -6.4(13.8) mmHg, p=0.002 vs default calibration], whereas DBP accuracy and variability remained similar [mean(SD) difference: 9.0(8.4) mmHg, p=0.23 vs default calibration]. Conclusions. The Uscom BP+ cuff device does not pass the Artery Society accuracy criteria compared with invasively measured central BP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001062588.05763.fc
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Michał Kosowski, Rosa Curcio, Sarang Paleri, Nathan Dwyer et al.
Journal of Hypertension
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Michał Kosowski, Rosa Curcio, Sarang Paleri, Nathan Dwyer, Jowita Zachwyc, Tan Van Bui, Phillip Roberts-Thomson, Wojciech Kosmala, Heath Adams, Alessio Arrivi, Dean S. Picone, James E. Sharman, Giacomo Pucci, Martin Schultz, Andrew Black
article en

Abstract

Background and objective. Uscom BP+ is a cuff-based blood pressure (BP) device designed to non-invasively estimate central BP as distinct from conventional brachial BP. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the Uscom BP+ device compared to invasively measured BP. Methods. Automated non-invasive cuff central BP (using the Uscom BP+ device) and invasive central aortic BP (using fluid-filled catheters) were recorded simultaneously in 191 participants (65% male, aged 66±11 years) receiving coronary angiography at three independent research sites (Hobart, Australia, Perugia, Italy and Wroclaw, Poland). Validation assessment procedures were undertaken according to the Artery Society recommendations and with a minimal acceptable error of ≤5±≤8 mmHg as pass criteria. Results. Using the device default calibration technique (brachial cuff systolic [SBP] and diastolic BP [DBP]), cuff central SBP underestimated invasive central SBP [mean(SD) difference: -10.2(11.2) mmHg] and cuff central DBP overestimated invasive central DBP [mean(SD) difference: 9.7(8.6) mmHg]. When calibrating by cuff mean arterial pressure and DBP in a sub-group (n=140), SBP accuracy was improved, but variability remained high [mean(SD) difference: -6.4(13.8) mmHg, p=0.002 vs default calibration], whereas DBP accuracy and variability remained similar [mean(SD) difference: 9.0(8.4) mmHg, p=0.23 vs default calibration]. Conclusions. The Uscom BP+ cuff device does not pass the Artery Society accuracy criteria compared with invasively measured central BP.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 42(Suppl 3)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Perugia (IT), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), ASM Terni (Italy) (IT), Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.