O30 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED AUTOMATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR CHILDREN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background and Objective: Properly validated automated upper-arm cuff blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently recommended for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement. However, the validation of BP devices in children presents additional challenges, necessitating separate studies. This study assessed the evidence on accurate automated BP devices in children. Methods: STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) performs periodic systematic PubMed searches to identify validation studies of automated cuff BP monitors. Validation studies including children (3-12 years) conducted using an established protocol, including the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018), ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013/2009, ESH-IP 2010/2002, AAMI 2002/1992/1987, and BHS 1993/1990, were identified from the STRIDE BP database. Results: Of 569 validation studies included in the STRIDE BP database, 47 (33 devices) were identified including children. Among them, STRIDE BP rejected 29 studies of which 18 were reported as “device pass” in the published paper. Among studies rejected by STRIDE BP but published as “pass”, main reasons for rejection were violations in the BP measurement procedure (sequence, number, repeats) (50%), inadequate reference device or cuffs for reference and test device (16.6%), inadequate sample size (22.2%), and single observer for reference BP (22.2%). Eventually 18 studies in children (38.3%) fulfilled all the validation protocol requirements, and 16 devices (10 available on the market) met the validation requirements and can be recommended for use in children. When additional ‘equivalent’ devices were considered (devices lacking validation studies but with differences from validated devices not affecting the measurement accuracy), 21 devices were found to be accurate, with 13 of them available on the market (Table). Conclusions: This analysis highlight a serious shortage of properly validated BP devices for children available in the market, with published validation studies often having major methodological issues. There is an urgent call to manufacturers and investigators to develop and properly validate more BP devices for children. TABLE. Validated devices for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement in children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001062584.28699.5b
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O30 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED AUTOMATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR CHILDREN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Paolo Palatini, Gianfranco Parati, George S. Stergiou, Ariadni Menti et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hypertension
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
0.72
article

O30 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED AUTOMATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR CHILDREN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Paolo Palatini, Gianfranco Parati, George S. Stergiou, Ariadni Menti, Αναστάσιος Κόλλιας, Aletta Elisabeth Schutte, Konstantinos Kyriakoulis, Dimitrios Mariglis, Jiguang Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and Objective: Properly validated automated upper-arm cuff blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently recommended for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement. However, the validation of BP devices in children presents additional challenges, necessitating separate studies. This study assessed the evidence on accurate automated BP devices in children. Methods: STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) performs periodic systematic PubMed searches to identify validation studies of automated cuff BP monitors. Validation studies including children (3-12 years) conducted using an established protocol, including the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018), ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013/2009, ESH-IP 2010/2002, AAMI 2002/1992/1987, and BHS 1993/1990, were identified from the STRIDE BP database. Results: Of 569 validation studies included in the STRIDE BP database, 47 (33 devices) were identified including children. Among them, STRIDE BP rejected 29 studies of which 18 were reported as “device pass” in the published paper. Among studies rejected by STRIDE BP but published as “pass”, main reasons for rejection were violations in the BP measurement procedure (sequence, number, repeats) (50%), inadequate reference device or cuffs for reference and test device (16.6%), inadequate sample size (22.2%), and single observer for reference BP (22.2%). Eventually 18 studies in children (38.3%) fulfilled all the validation protocol requirements, and 16 devices (10 available on the market) met the validation requirements and can be recommended for use in children. When additional ‘equivalent’ devices were considered (devices lacking validation studies but with differences from validated devices not affecting the measurement accuracy), 21 devices were found to be accurate, with 13 of them available on the market (Table). Conclusions: This analysis highlight a serious shortage of properly validated BP devices for children available in the market, with published validation studies often having major methodological issues. There is an urgent call to manufacturers and investigators to develop and properly validate more BP devices for children. TABLE. Validated devices for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement in children.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 42(Suppl 3)
University of Padua (IT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), UNSW Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Shanghai Institute of Hypertension (CN), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.