O32 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background and Objective: Validated automated upper-arm cuff blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently recommended for BP measurement. However, a validated BP device in the general population may be inaccurate in pregnant women. Thus, separate validation studies are required in pregnant women with normal BP, hypertension, and preeclampsia. This study assessed the published evidence on BP devices in pregnancy. Methods: STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) performs periodic systematic PubMed searches to identify validation studies of automated cuff BP monitors. Validation studies in pregnancy conducted using an established protocol, including the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018), ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013/2009, ESH-IP 2010/2002, AAMI 2002/1992/1987, and BHS 1993/1990, were identified. Results: Of 569 validation studies included in the STRIDE BP database, 63 (35 devices) were identified including pregnant women. Among them, STRIDE BP rejected 45 studies, of which 25 were reported as “device pass” in the published validation paper. Among the studies rejected by STRIDE BP but published as “pass”, the main reasons for rejection were violations in the BP measurement protocol (44%), inadequate reference device or cuffs for reference and test device (36%), no data in women with hypertension and/or preeclampsia (36%), single observer for reference BP measurement (28%), and inappropriate data analysis (20%). Eventually 18 studies in pregnant women (28.6%) fulfilled the protocol requirements, and 16 devices (8 of them available on the market) can be recommended for clinical use in pregnancy. When additional ‘equivalent’ devices were considered (devices lacking validation studies but with differences from validated devices not affecting the BP measurement accuracy), 37 devices were found to be accurate in pregnancy, with 27 of them available on the market (Table). Conclusions: This analysis showed a shortage of properly validated BP devices for pregnant women available in the market, with published validation often having major methodological issues. There is an urgent need to develop and properly validate more BP devices in pregnancy. TABLE. Validated devices for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement in pregnant women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001062592.89400.1e
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O32 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Paolo Palatini, Gianfranco Parati, George S. Stergiou, Ariadni Menti et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hypertension
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
0.40
article

O32 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Paolo Palatini, Gianfranco Parati, George S. Stergiou, Ariadni Menti, Αναστάσιος Κόλλιας, Aletta Elisabeth Schutte, Konstantinos Kyriakoulis, Dimitrios Mariglis, Jiguang Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background and Objective: Validated automated upper-arm cuff blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are currently recommended for BP measurement. However, a validated BP device in the general population may be inaccurate in pregnant women. Thus, separate validation studies are required in pregnant women with normal BP, hypertension, and preeclampsia. This study assessed the published evidence on BP devices in pregnancy. Methods: STRIDE BP (www.stridebp.org) performs periodic systematic PubMed searches to identify validation studies of automated cuff BP monitors. Validation studies in pregnancy conducted using an established protocol, including the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018), ANSI/AAMI/ISO 2013/2009, ESH-IP 2010/2002, AAMI 2002/1992/1987, and BHS 1993/1990, were identified. Results: Of 569 validation studies included in the STRIDE BP database, 63 (35 devices) were identified including pregnant women. Among them, STRIDE BP rejected 45 studies, of which 25 were reported as “device pass” in the published validation paper. Among the studies rejected by STRIDE BP but published as “pass”, the main reasons for rejection were violations in the BP measurement protocol (44%), inadequate reference device or cuffs for reference and test device (36%), no data in women with hypertension and/or preeclampsia (36%), single observer for reference BP measurement (28%), and inappropriate data analysis (20%). Eventually 18 studies in pregnant women (28.6%) fulfilled the protocol requirements, and 16 devices (8 of them available on the market) can be recommended for clinical use in pregnancy. When additional ‘equivalent’ devices were considered (devices lacking validation studies but with differences from validated devices not affecting the BP measurement accuracy), 37 devices were found to be accurate in pregnancy, with 27 of them available on the market (Table). Conclusions: This analysis showed a shortage of properly validated BP devices for pregnant women available in the market, with published validation often having major methodological issues. There is an urgent need to develop and properly validate more BP devices in pregnancy. TABLE. Validated devices for office, home, and ambulatory BP measurement in pregnant women.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 42(Suppl 3)
University of Padua (IT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), UNSW Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Shanghai Institute of Hypertension (CN), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.