P148 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SACUBITRIL/ALLISARTAN FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY HYPERTENSION: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
Background: This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/allisartan, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, compared with olmesartan in Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: Eligible patients aged 18-75 years (n=1197) with mild to moderate hypertension were randomized to receive sacubitril/allisartan 240 mg (n=399), sacubitril/allisartan 480 mg (n=399), or olmesartan 20 mg (n=399) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who completed the 12-week treatment then received another 12-week extended treatment (n=1084) and 28-week prolonged treatment (n=189). The primary end point was a reduction in clinic mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) from baseline with various doses of sacubitril/allisartan versus olmesartan at 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure for the comparison between sacubitril/allisartan and olmesartan at week 12, 24, and 52. Results: Sacubitril/allisartan 240 mg/day provided a greater reduction in msSBP than olmesartan at 12 weeks (between-group difference: -1.9 mmHg [95% confidence interval -4.2 to 0.4 mmHg], P=0.0007, for non-inferiority). Sacubitril/allisartan 480 mg/day provided a significantly greater reduction in msSBP than olmesartan at 12 weeks (between-treatment difference: -5.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval -7.3 to -2.8 mmHg], P<0.001, for superiority). Greater reductions in 24-h, daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also observed with both doses of sacubitril/allisartan compared with olmesartan (P≤0.001 for 480 mg/day). The blood pressure reductions tended to be dose-dependent for sacubitril/allisartan. Sacubitril/allisartan was well tolerated, and no cases of angioedema or death were reported. Conclusions: Sacubitril/allisartan is effective for the treatment of hypertension and well tolerated in Chinese patients.
Authors
- Shao-Xing Chen
- Jin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-0338)
- Jing-Chao Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6536-3449)
- Jie Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-6363)
- Zichen Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6008)
- Xiaohong Lu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-0250)
- Jinfeng Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-0328)
- Wei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-2371)
- Qiang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3079-6383)
- Yan Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5889-4228)
- Wenjie Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-3230)
- Qian Ge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-1788)
- Xiangnan Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-5176)
- Jiguang Wang
Institutions
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Ruijin Hospital (CN)
- Shanghai Institute of Hypertension (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001063464.65046.75
- Primary Topic
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00